Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city)
rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx 13 Feb 2016 07:18 UTC
On 12 Feb 2016 at 17:55, Craig Berry wrote:
> The Jump Bubble explanation is the one that comes closest to both
> making some kind of sense, and being canonical. It's contradicted by
> Darrian antimatter ships and the Annic Nova. But I'm happy to eject
> those from canon to make things work reasonably.
So am I, or to change them so they only get to use those as power plants to charge the
jump drive. No useful reduction in fuel consumption. That said, I'm willing to entertain
an improvement in fuel consumption at TL17+, as Megatraveller had. Jump range
might be capped at J6, but more efficient bubble formation and maintainence could be
a thing (not that my games see TL17 tech).