Re: [TML] Finding transport
Phil Pugliese 09 May 2015 10:48 UTC
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 5/9/15, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [TML] Finding transport
To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
Date: Saturday, May 9, 2015, 12:27 AM
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at
11:34 AM, Bruce Johnson <xxxxxx@pharmacy.arizona.edu>
wrote:
And
how well do that work out for him? He got sucked into russia
with an over-extended supply line, and limited resources
against an entrenched opponent with easy access to
replenishment, and near parity in TL (up to parity by the
turning point of the war).
I’d say the German invasion of Russia rather proves my
point.
I'm not sure what your point
was.
But the point I
was responding to was Dave's point that a lack of
economic resources is the usual motivation for
invasion.
But after
factoring in all incidental costs (such as maintaining a
permanent garrison or the reputation one gets after
committing the genocide necessary to avoid said garrison),
trading for whatever it is always cheaper than invading to
"simply" take it
So the economic reasons behind
invasions are really psychological reasons: taking direct
control of resources is perceived as intangible variable
which justifies the vastly higher cost of invasion over
trade.
[Phil's two
replies above agree with this.]
The above being true, then it
doesn't matter whether the OTU possesses relatively
scarce basic resources or relatively plentiful ones. In
either case, it's the intangible (and thus
psychological) variable which matters, not objective
reality.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I've just been browsing thru 'Pocket Empires' & it mentions that as a result of Cleon's coup/usurpation/whatever the Zhunastu Corp now had an effective monopoly on any & all gov contracts & thus effectively began squeezing out all competitors.
Some of which actually (a scenario is included) went off into the hinterlands to try to duplicate his feat for themselves. It occurs to me there were probably any number of alternative methods to secure effective economic hegemony, some of which may have even been more efficient. However choosing a different tack wouldn't have allowed Cleon to don the imperial mantle of 'greatness' & achieve a sort of immortality... very ego-appealing, no?
=====================================================================