Re: [TML] Waving Hands Over The Jump Drive
Alex Goodwin 28 Jun 2020 05:22 UTC
On 28/6/20 1:25 pm, Thomas Jones-Low wrote:
> This is brilliant.
>
> The other thing to keep in mind is developing the Jump Drive is a
> difficult challenge. It’s only been done seven times in in the history
> of Charted Space. Based on the outcomes of the misjumps and a few
> other statements, the process of entering jump space is an unstable,
> chaotic one. You, the Astrogator and the computer system you are using
> need to know a number of factors to a high degree accuracy.
>
> Factors would include the gravitational stress at the point on
> entrance ( the 100D limit), exit (same as before), the stability of
> the field generated for entrance, and any known potential masses along
> the flight path.
>
> The use of unrefined fuel causes fluctuations in the power output of
> the BHHR, or in the density of the bubble. Which causes the jump field
> to fluctuate, and cause the misjumps. Scout and military ships avoid
> the problem simply by overbuilding the power systems and overcharging
> the hull grid.
>
> In some cases the misjumps cause the field to collapse. In others the
> unstable wormhole leaps off in an unexpected direction through space
> time. The reason you can’t just repeat the misjump to extend the range
> of a normal jump is the initial conditions are not known with enough
> accuracy to safely replicate. And get them a little wrong, and you end
> up as a spray of quarks at the far end.
>
> This is in fact the reason it’s so difficult to build a jump drive.
> The basic equations applied show the process won’t work. It’s not
> stable, and very dangerous.
>
> There was a discussion earlier about aliens being amazed at the risks
> humans would take. Jump Drives are a version of that. No one who
> understands the jump space equations ever wants to fly in a ship, the
> margin for error is just too small.
Thomas,
By "chaotic", are you meaning "extremely sensitive to initial
conditions", especially in the misjump regime(s)? Like near-Heisenberg
sensitivity?
Maybe for a quote, and riffing somewhat off Paul Dirac (on quantum gubbins):
"Those who aren't terrified by jumpspace physics don't understand it."-
Dr Elderly Distinguished-Scientist
"The first step to understanding jumpspace is sheer terror." - Dr
Elderly Distinguished-Scientist
"The second step to understanding jumpspace is recovering from the
maths." - Ten-Yeared Graduate-Student
I get the impression that discovering Jump independently would be a
massive exercise in Zen - multiple, apparently-mutually-contradictory,
things that combine to point and laugh at what you _think_ you know.
Now you've gotten me interested at figuring out how TL Foo's "misjump"
becomes TL (Foo + N)'s "higher performance drive".