Re: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives
Phil Pugliese 27 Oct 2014 17:25 UTC
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 10/27/14, Kenneth Barns <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: [TML] Reflections on LBB2v2 versus HGv2 for drives
To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
Date: Monday, October 27, 2014, 6:20 AM
[SNIP]
STARTING OBSERVATIONS:*
"Standard hulls" from LBB2 are not explicitly
allowed by the HG build sequence. Although much cheaper
for smaller craft up to 400-ton, the enforced
compartmentalisation of "standard hulls"
drastically limits Jump capacity. 100-ton craft are
limited to J2. 200-ton to J1. 400-ton to J2.*
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'm a little confused here;
(but then this *is* Traveller, no?) ;-)
I just looked at my LBB2v2 (from the DeLuxe set) & also the hb 'Traveller Book' & the charts there show (on the 'Drive Potential' table) that J6 can be obtained up to 2000dT, J4 up to 3000dT, J3 up to 4000dT, & J2 up to 5000dT.
5000dT is as far as the table goes for hull size.
In the 'T'Book' there is detailed a 'Type M' (subsidized liner). Using a 600dT hull, it has J3 & 1G.
In addition there is the 'Type C' (mercenary cruiser). Using an 800dT hull, it has J3 & 3G.
Also there is the 'Type T' (patrol cruiser). Using a 400dT hull, it has J3 & 4G, which would seem to contradict the "400-ton to J2" limit you mention above?
=================================================================================