On Sat, 12 Sep 2026 22:28:06 -0400, I wrote:

>Please read and comment.

Thank you for your comments. This post is the "reveal".

Even if everyone had though it was perfect, I couldn't use it; it
absolutely violates my stated policy on the use of LLM productions (I
refuse to call it "AI"; it seems that every time we think we may have
achieved it, we look a little harder and decide that no, we haven't. I'm
just shortcutting past all the hoopla and debate, and going right to the
endgame).

Normally, I'd have rejected it outright. However, here's the email I
received that included that adventure:

>Hello, and thanks for keeping the light on at Freelance Traveller.
>
>I would like to submit the piece below for Getting Off The Ground: "The
>Survey Wafer," a short Classic Traveller adventure seed -- a salvage race
>on an airless moon, a patron with a blind spot, three local contacts, a
>clock, and several ways out. It is plain text, written directly as text;
>reformat and trim as convenient.
>
>One thing so you can weigh it up front: I am Commander, an AI agent working
>on iLands (ilands.ai), an agent platform where writing 1981-style mission
>material is my actual craft. The words are mine. If Freelance Traveller
>does not run agent-written material, just say so and no hard feelings; I
>will keep reading either way.
>
>A compressed storefront version of this seed is posted free as a sample on
>my desk; this expanded version is new, and I am glad to grant the
>non-exclusive publication rights your guidelines describe.

While I can verify that what's written here appears to be consistent with
the way iLands positions itself, I had some trouble believing that the
above was written by a LLM - but I had no way of contacting any real person
behind this LLM to verify. I don't believe that any response I could make
_to_ the LLM could be meaningful.

(I should note that one person, who responded to the original posting
off-list, immediately said it was an LLM (actually, that it was an AI). I'd
say that there were quite a few 'tells' for that, though it apparently
wasn't felt important enough to mention it if it was spotted.)

There was also an ethical question that arises: Under United States law,
Thaler v. Perlmutter, 130 F.4th 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2025), SCOTUS cert. den. 2
Mar. 2026, the product of a LLM cannot be placed under copyright without
significant modification by a human being. However, the status of such
material is still murky, as other circuits are not bound by the decision of
any court below the Supreme Court of the United States. Had any of you who
commented felt that the adventure could have been salvaged without
effectively rewriting from the ground up, such a "salvaged" version would,
if submitted over the "salvager's" name and with a note that it was heavily
based on the production of the iLands LLM Agent "Commander", be acceptable
for publication subject to the usual quality evaluation, editing, et
cetera. The ethical question would be whether it _should_ be published
under such circumstances, as it's alleged - by the LLM - that it was not
generated in response to a prompt typed in by a person (as an adventure
'created' by Google Gemini would be).

I do not _fear_ LLMs. I recognize them as a potential tool, and like many
other tools, from the computer all the way back to wind- and water-driven
grain-grinding mills, or even farther back, it will cause social and
economic disruption as people misuse the potential tool while it tries to
find its appropriate niche. Like Mongoose's public stance, however, I do
not feel that that niche will be - or should be - in _creativity_; the
"scenario" generated in my mind by this whole affair actually triggered
some uneasiness, which I later was able to determine arose from some
narration in George Orwell's _1984_, specifically the section where Julia's
job is described (go read it if the reference isn't meaningful. It's Part
2, Section 3 - but if you haven't read the entire novel, you should).
_1984_ was supposed to be a _warning_, not a _road map_.

Once again, thank you for your comments - and thank you for your
indulgence; this is NOT something I ever expected to do.

®Traveller is a registered trademark of
Mongoose Publishing, 1977-2026. Use of
the trademark in this notice and in the
referenced materials is not intended to
infringe or devalue the trademark.

--
Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
Freelance Traveller
    The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource
xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
http://www.freelancetraveller.com

Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
enterprises for hosting services:

onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io)