|
CEPHEUS JOURNAL ALERT: It's down!
Jeff Zeitlin
(11 Jul 2025 12:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] CEPHEUS JOURNAL ALERT: It's down!
Hemdian
(11 Jul 2025 16:54 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] CEPHEUS JOURNAL ALERT: It's down!
Gottfried Neuner
(11 Jul 2025 17:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] CEPHEUS JOURNAL ALERT: It's down!
Charles McKnight
(14 Jul 2025 16:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] CEPHEUS JOURNAL ALERT: It's down!
Charles McKnight
(14 Jul 2025 20:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] CEPHEUS JOURNAL ALERT: It's down!
Tom Rux
(15 Jul 2025 03:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] CEPHEUS JOURNAL ALERT: It's down!
J. Michael Looney
(15 Jul 2025 03:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] CEPHEUS JOURNAL ALERT: It's down!
Jeff Zeitlin
(15 Jul 2025 11:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] CEPHEUS JOURNAL ALERT: It's down!
Charles McKnight
(15 Jul 2025 17:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] CEPHEUS JOURNAL ALERT: It's down!
Alan Peery
(17 Jul 2025 09:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] CEPHEUS JOURNAL ALERT: It's down!
Tom Rux
(17 Jul 2025 12:35 UTC)
|
|
Pre-Traveller reference
Mark Urbin
(20 Jul 2025 15:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
David Johnson
(21 Jul 2025 14:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(02 Aug 2025 02:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Hemdian
(02 Aug 2025 03:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Richard Aiken
(02 Aug 2025 05:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Charles McKnight
(05 Aug 2025 16:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Richard Aiken
(05 Aug 2025 17:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Phil Pugliese
(05 Aug 2025 20:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Jeff Zeitlin
(05 Aug 2025 19:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Charles McKnight
(05 Aug 2025 20:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(06 Aug 2025 06:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Ian Whitchurch
(06 Aug 2025 09:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
James Catchpole
(06 Aug 2025 09:49 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(07 Aug 2025 04:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Alex Goodwin
(08 Aug 2025 02:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(10 Aug 2025 19:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Phil Pugliese
(10 Aug 2025 23:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Alex Goodwin
(14 Aug 2025 05:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(14 Aug 2025 16:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Richard Aiken
(15 Aug 2025 12:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(24 Aug 2025 19:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference Alex Goodwin (25 Aug 2025 00:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(25 Aug 2025 16:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Phil Pugliese
(25 Aug 2025 18:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Phil Pugliese
(25 Aug 2025 02:39 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(25 Aug 2025 16:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Phil Pugliese
(25 Aug 2025 19:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Richard Aiken
(01 Sep 2025 02:43 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Phil Pugliese
(01 Sep 2025 03:03 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(01 Sep 2025 09:14 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Phil Pugliese
(02 Sep 2025 16:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Alan Peery
(08 Aug 2025 08:19 UTC)
|
|
RE: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
ewan@xxxxxx
(08 Aug 2025 22:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Mark Urbin
(31 Aug 2025 16:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(10 Aug 2025 19:59 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Phil Pugliese
(11 Aug 2025 00:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Pre-Traveller reference
Phil Pugliese
(11 Aug 2025 00:55 UTC)
|
On 25/8/25 05:45, kaladorn at gmail.com (via tml list) wrote: > <snip> > The gist of what I was getting in return was: > > There are many reasons that Megacorps, governments, and other actors > would not provide medical cures or even treatments, despite (as Alex > suggest) that it would be smart to do so. The 3I is a government of > men, not laws. And 3I is also full of corruption (many examples over > the editions). And as 3I largely leaves planets/planets themselves to > their own affairs, the leaders and NGOs in those planets/systems may > have their own reasons to overprice, prevent distribution, or > otherwise do things within their own planets. > > Here are some of the reasons and actors: > > * Powerful nobles muddling in for their own reasons (petty or otherwise) > * Powerful leaders of planets and systems muddling in for their own > reasons (petty or otherwise) > * Powerful NGOs in for the own reasons (petty or otherwise) > * Religious leaders with large reach muddling in for their own > reasons (pick many strange reasons that all tie to control) > * Foreign actors muddling in for their own reasons (probably for > 'war by other means') > * Any entity that might be concerned with liabilities for providing > medical cures where blow back (for real concerns or from other > reasons) are in play > > Here as some of the tactics: > > * Intellectual Property (owned by Megacorps or individual planets > that developed these things) - same reasons as seen in the real > world and in the 3I where we see many harmful or at least uncaring > decisions (3I government, nobles, megacorps, etc) - even have some > Amber or Red designation and some may have been put in place > punitively or some corrupt reason > > * Collusion in pricing by oligopolies (This is not trade being > stopped - nothing in Traveller says that a good can't just be too > expensive for most - if you look at trade tables, you sure see > examples of that and there has also been seen adventures relating > to medical situations which involve Megacorps and other sources of > drugs doing something unethical) > > * Agreements on distribution of product between Megacorps or other > large actors (It's not that anyone stops trade, its just that > these Megacorps just 'happen' to only sell their med in an areas > the nearby Megacorps don't and reciprocally 'this just happens' in > return) - In this version, one version of a med is provided in one > area, another in a different place. This probably could be a thing > someone could call restraint of trade, but since all the big > players that have the scientific data and that have the > distribution engines are owned by some people who want to maximize > the costs, 'its just happens' (aka the Megacorps and other > entities know what's going on) > > * The reality that powerful nobles, powerful leaders and others very > often are getting good incomes and that's more important to them > than exactly what is done (Capitalism basically operates by > pursuing 'within the rules PLUS as much of the grey areas PLUS the > disallowed but not likely to get you caught'). > > * Surge price (systems that drop prices to a point when goods are > not moving and increase prices when there is demand or there is a > shortage [incidentally or intentionally]) are possible within the 3I > > * Powerful actors (Megacorps, powerful factors, local politicians or > leaders, religious leaders, and NGOs) can buy up or destroy key > reagents such as to limit or prevent a particular part of a cure > due to the lack of said reagent and this can happen without anyone > involve trade between planets - if you can't get the reagents from > the local planet/system governments or the reagent has been badly > savaged or wiped out, its not directly an assault on trade, just > on reagents > > * Tying other benefits (say building schools or the like from the > real world or in a conceivable situation, getting a cure or > treatment) for local planetary/system governments (or their > leaders or for populations) require (not officially of course) > those recipients also join a religion (ignoring the existing > religious setup before the offer was made) > > * Underhanded actors (Megacorps and others) may create maladies > which they quickly then provide to afflicted populations for a > 'reasonable cost for the newly discovered treatment' while also > hiding the fact they have a real cure (because said real cure only > provides a one-time payment, treatments are evergreen... money > coming in over the long run is often preferred) - totally illegal, > but a lot of corporations have hid dark projects in covert > locations inside and outside of the 3I. > > * Religious groups, cultural groups, rich folks who have some $$$ > and can make more by firing out misinformation for their own > reasons, people that listened to influencers, people who have poor > educations, people who are not thinking rationally (often happens > to varying degrees) may either try to prevent treatments or cures > for unreasonable reasons (just look on the internet) or they may > convince their followers that the sky is pink (some odd belief > like 'this treatment makes your left foot fall off') and the > followers buy into it and thus doing take available meds > (sometimes to take another thing that could be harmful but can > bring $$$ to the person or group who is pulling the strings in the > shadows > > > Our real world provides examples of most of those things (or something > close to). > > We know that large pharma in our world have buried cures in favour of > treatments. Corporations buy up treatments, procedures, and develop > them and then bury them if the can make more money from what they have > at the current moment. Corporations also buy up labs, treatments, > cures from competitors so they never see the light of day - what's bad > to your competitor is good for your company. Corporations can also > bury things until they can figure out how to maximize profits and > cures aren't that and even some treatments aren't. We know that > corporations have hidden side effects or let out drugs that they knew > had long term harms without disclosing. > > We know that governments have prevented treatments or any medical > supplies (or even food) for that government's reason. > > We have patent trolls buying up from the original companies or > universities and jumped the cost of the meds by 2 to 10 times. > > We know that religious groups have tied aid to conversions. > > Having seen these examples and more in the real word, I can see so > many ways that meds don't get distributed that I think that's more > likely to be what the 3I looks like than Alex's TU. > > Alex's (logical and human) view in his GURPS Traveller TU is a lot > smarter but I don't see that in our world and I see many of the > reasons that wouldn't happen based on what I've seen of the Classic > Traveller universe and the adventures and products put out over the > years. > > And to be clear, I'd rather live in Alex's TU than the 3I - given what > I've see of the 3I and in our real world. > > But like Star Trek's idea that money can be done away with ... I'm not > sure we'll ever get rid of money or the intention to keep the other > guy down while you get rich. > > Just my own example of corporation's behaviour: > > ex: My wife has back/leg problems from cancer and other causes and > there are two treatments - one that have you taking 12-16 needles > every 3 weeks (with a couple bad days as it wears off and when the new > one is injected...so she loses 3-4 days ever 21) and the second > treatment is a spinal (1-4 needles) that takes about the same down > time every 8-12 weeks. The clinic my wife went to lied to the patients > (saying the second procedure wasn't available due to untrue reasons) > because when you got 12-16 needles into your back every 3rd week, the > clinic made more money - for the visits and for use of more meds in > the injections - despite the fact is was worse for the patient's > well-being. > > kaladorn, I guess that I see noblesse oblige being stronger (and honoured more in the observance than the breach) in at least some parts of MGTU than you (seem to) do in YTU - thus at least some subsector governments supplying mid-end panimmunity for all worlds in their demesne. Or in a "Wounded Colossus"-style ATL after Strephon regains the throne and has to re-found the 3I. However, just because (frinstance) the _Five Sisters_ subsector government does so, that doesn't (of itself) mean the _Mora_ subsector government does. The Daryens would probably do so, given their greater focus on the collective over the individual. Also real-world, you have the existence of monopsonies (such as the healthcare systems of developed nations _other_ than the USA). That would tend to counteract the shenanigans you mentioned _somewhat_. Again, that's a concern between the tension of a TU which is good to adventure in, vs a TU you might want to _live_ in. You yourself said it. I don't think the communism of C24 Star Trek, up to and including the abolition of the _concept_ of private property (cf Old Baldy _not grokking_ the idea that a revivee would want to check on their investment portfolio), let alone state control of comms and transport, would work - there would need to be _some_ method of allocating resources. Again IMGTU, the juggernaut of Iderati (where a G3TL12 hi pop world, Iderati V, is _lost in the noise_ of the system's G3TL13 mainworld) doesn't top up the subsector-government-provided panimmunity for the ~30-40 billion odd people in lower socioeconomic classes (at G3TL12), just for the ~10 billion or so in upper socioeconomic classes (at G3TL13). This is _despite_ being a place where a bug that evolves to cause top-end panimmunity a problem and subsequently escaping out-system would cause all _sorts_ of mayhem across at least the subsector, if not further. Alex