For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Jeff Zeitlin (15 Apr 2025 23:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Harold Hale (16 Apr 2025 02:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions David Johnson (16 Apr 2025 03:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Charles McKnight (16 Apr 2025 03:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions David Johnson (16 Apr 2025 03:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Charles McKnight (16 Apr 2025 03:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions David Johnson (16 Apr 2025 14:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Jeff Zeitlin (17 Apr 2025 13:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions David Johnson (18 Apr 2025 03:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Evyn MacDude (17 Apr 2025 20:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Evyn MacDude (17 Apr 2025 20:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Richard Aiken (17 Apr 2025 22:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Jeff Zeitlin (17 Apr 2025 22:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Evyn MacDude (17 Apr 2025 22:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Jeff Zeitlin (17 Apr 2025 23:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions David Johnson (18 Apr 2025 03:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Jeff Zeitlin (17 Apr 2025 22:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Harold Hale (19 Apr 2025 01:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Jeff Zeitlin (19 Apr 2025 09:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Jim Vassilakos (19 Apr 2025 17:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Charles McKnight (19 Apr 2025 17:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Jeff Zeitlin (19 Apr 2025 19:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Charles McKnight (19 Apr 2025 19:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions greg caires (19 Apr 2025 20:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Charles McKnight (19 Apr 2025 20:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions greg caires (19 Apr 2025 21:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Jeff Zeitlin (19 Apr 2025 19:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Evyn MacDude (19 Apr 2025 20:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Charles McKnight (19 Apr 2025 20:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions greg caires (19 Apr 2025 21:21 UTC)

Re: [TML] For Comment: Rules for Generating Religions Jeff Zeitlin 19 Apr 2025 19:21 UTC

On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 10:37:01 -0700, Jim Vassilakos - jim.vassilakos at
gmail.com (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote to Freelance
Traveller:

>Jeff, I think your article is a good start, but Traveller refs love tables,
>and it only takes a couple of pages to turn good ideas into something
>usable [see Grand Census (DGP, 1987), pgs. 46-47].

Yes, those are part of the sections still labelled as 'to be written'. I
wasn't sure it was a good idea to start on actual generation rules without
feedback on the basic idea; if feedback said that I was way off base with
basic ideas, I didn't want to have to toss out major amounts of actual
rules and tables. As-is, this thread has tagged a couple of things that
need to be looked at that I hadn't addressed.

>Also, it would also be useful to including a section about religious
>conflicts and address how the Imperium keeps the peace (or doesn't). In the
>Plankwell PBEM, I included the Doctrine of
>Divine Mystery, also known as the Prime Doctrine, which every religion is
>supposed to include in order for it to fall under the Imperial Church as a
>recognized/sanctioned religion (see pages 69-76 of the campaign writeup
>downloadable from https://jimvassilakos.com/dos-programs/plank.html).
>Obviously, different referees may want to apply different solutions to this
>problem, but IMO it's something that needs to be addressed.

The interaction between the Imperium-as-interstellar-government and the
Megachurch of the Universal Superconsciousness is _not_ something that I
think THE RULES need to be involved with; that is definitely something that
is between the referee and the players and their perception of what the
Imperial Overgovernment looks like.

>By the way, I've been working on that article you requested regarding how
>to run a single-player, multi-referee PBEM, but it's not quite done yet.
>Unfortunately, it looks like it'll be pretty long.

That's not necessarily "unfortunate"; I've run long articles before (and
will undoubtedly do it again). At most, I might request that we work
together to tweak the final result to allow it to be broken up across a few
issues, if it gets _that_ long. Per my standard policy, you as the author
should give it the treatment you feel it needs/deserves, and let me worry
about length.

®Traveller is a registered trademark of
Mongoose Publishing, 1977-2025. Use of
the trademark in this notice and in the
referenced materials is not intended to
infringe or devalue the trademark.

--
Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
Freelance Traveller
    The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource
xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
http://www.freelancetraveller.com

Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
enterprises for hosting services:

onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io)