>
>>    Supernatural [Occurrences/Manifestations]
>>
>>    Events or actions that [are held to] fall outside natural law (or
>>    secular science). These are considered to necessarily imply the
>>    existence of a Deitic Principle; for natural law to be 'violated' would
>>    require an entity with volition to cause the violation - essentially,
>>    the definition of the Deitic Principle.
>
> But, in a science-fiction game, these won't actually exist. From a game play perspective, what will matter here are the implications for believers' beliefs in "supernatural things" when interacting with non-believers who don't share those beliefs (and vice versa).
>

I might argue the point that many things that we had no explanation for were deemed “supernatural” although as our knowledge increased some sort of “rational” explanation made itself known. I won’t get into whether or not the rationalization was accurate or not, but it seems to be the tendency to attribute the currently unexplainable to the “supernatural”, at least in my experience.