Tom,

OK, let's give that a try and see what the packages look like.

---Guy "wildstar" Garnett
xxxxxx@prismnet.com

> On May 5, 2015, at 4:43 PM, <xxxxxx@comcast.net> <xxxxxx@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Guy, I embarrassed to just now think about checking in TNE Brilliant Lances
> (BL) Technical Booklet, which is a short version of TNE FF&S. Both the HRT and
> PEMS sensors state that if the antenna diameter is greater than the hull length
> (unmodified by configuration), the antenna must be a folding array. There are
> thirty-three, at least I hope I counted all of them, hulls with ship data profiles
> on pp. 19-48. Seventeen of the hull, the scout/courier is one of them, have
> folding antenna arrays.  Based on the seventeen examples the hull length
> (unmodified by configuration) refers the the length found on the Hull Size table.
>
> TNE BL Technical Booklet, p. 19, has a 100 Td scout/courier with an
> 120,000 km PEMS sensor. The PEMS Table, p. 7, lists the fixed antenna
> diameter as 20 m which is > the 14 m base length of a 100 Td hull per the size
> table on p. 2. By folding the array in half an 100 Td hull with an unmodified
> length of 14 m could mount the area.
>
> I would like to suggest that the basic and improved sensors be fixed antenna
> arrays with the minimum hull length listed on the HRT/PEMS AD column. The
> small and medium military packages would be folding arrays with the minimum
> hull length of 0.5 x AD.
>
> Tom Rux
> -----
> The Traveller Mailing List
> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
> Report problems to xxxxxx@travellercentral.com
> To unsubscribe from this list please goto http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=BMQ2xsC7NtLdownlXBXcHc9DiROTd8Eu