Tom,

If I understand correctly, the issue is that the minimum length was computed assuming that the antennae would be a folding array if necessary, but the volumes were computed assuming that the antennae would be a fixed array.

On May 4, 2015, at 3:29 PM, Tom Rux <xxxxxx@comcast.net> wrote:
> My recommendation is to change the table Min Length data to match the antenna diameter in TNE FF&S Mk I Mod 0 for the HRT in TL-9 and the PEMS in TL-10+.  An alternative would be to recalculate all of the values based on a folding array.

I'd support either approach.  The only "gotcha" I can think of is that there needs to be some type of TL-9 sensor array that will fit on a 100-ton hull.

---Guy "Wildstar" Garnett
xxxxxx@prismnet.com