On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 10:22 AM Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 27Nov2019 0412, Jeffrey Schwartz wrote:
> > Are you suggesting an IMTU Retcon on cutter module shape?
> > If so, yeah, makes perfect sense, I endorse it.
> > Makes a lot of the published ship designs not work, though, since the
> > space allocated for spare cutter modules needs to expand.
>
> There's no reason a cutter designed for a square module couldn't carry
> the cylindrical standard module. Thus it's an extension of the new,
> non-standard, cutter's capability.
>
> --

Sure, agree
I'm just saying that for things like the Merc Cruiser, where it lists
the ship has extra cutter modules aboard, the ship deck plans and
specs would be off if you went to square modules for everything