On 27Nov2019 0412, Jeffrey Schwartz wrote:
> Are you suggesting an IMTU Retcon on cutter module shape?
> If so, yeah, makes perfect sense, I endorse it.
> Makes a lot of the published ship designs not work, though, since the
> space allocated for spare cutter modules needs to expand.

There's no reason a cutter designed for a square module couldn't carry
the cylindrical standard module. Thus it's an extension of the new,
non-standard, cutter's capability.

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>