Why do we read Piper's works? Terrence Fugate (22 Mar 2026 19:43 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Jay P Hailey (22 Mar 2026 21:07 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Terrence Fugate (22 Mar 2026 21:35 UTC)
October 1962 (was: Why do we read Piper's works?) David Johnson (22 Mar 2026 23:17 UTC)
Re: [HBP] October 1962 (was: Why do we read Piper's works?) Terrence Fugate (22 Mar 2026 23:49 UTC)
Re: [HBP] October 1962 Jay P Hailey (23 Mar 2026 00:16 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? David Sooby (22 Mar 2026 22:53 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Gregg Levine (22 Mar 2026 23:37 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Terrence Fugate (22 Mar 2026 23:43 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Jay P Hailey (23 Mar 2026 00:17 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Gregg Levine (23 Mar 2026 02:15 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Jon Crocker (23 Mar 2026 20:14 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Terrence Fugate (24 Mar 2026 18:40 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? David Johnson (22 Mar 2026 23:01 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Terrence Fugate (22 Mar 2026 23:20 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? David Sooby (23 Mar 2026 00:06 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Terrence Fugate (23 Mar 2026 01:07 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? dbernat (24 Mar 2026 00:01 UTC)
Beam's "girls" (was: Why do we read Piper's works?) David Johnson (24 Mar 2026 00:29 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Piper and 1960's sexism dbernat (24 Mar 2026 05:50 UTC)
Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? David Johnson (23 Mar 2026 01:57 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? dbernat 24 Mar 2026 00:01 UTC

David Sooby wrote:

> And if one is going to look for something that will offend the
> "political correctness police", there's this passage from the book:
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Conn, is my father going back to Koshchei?"
>
> "As soon as we can round up some people to help us on the ship."
>
> "Then I'm going along. I've had it, Conn. I'm a combat-fatigue case."
>
> "But, Sylvie; that isn't any place for a girl."
>
> "Oh, poo! This is Sylvie. We're old war buddies. We soldiered together
> on Barathrum; remember?"
>
> "Well, you'd be the only girl, and...."

Is this Piper or editorial changes by the publisher?