Re: [HBP] October 1962

Show/hide message thread

Why do we read Piper's works? Terrence Fugate (22 Mar 2026 19:43 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Jay P Hailey (22 Mar 2026 21:07 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Terrence Fugate (22 Mar 2026 21:35 UTC)

October 1962 (was: Why do we read Piper's works?) David Johnson (22 Mar 2026 23:17 UTC)

Re: [HBP] October 1962 (was: Why do we read Piper's works?) Terrence Fugate (22 Mar 2026 23:49 UTC)

Re: [HBP] October 1962 Jay P Hailey (23 Mar 2026 00:16 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? David Sooby (22 Mar 2026 22:53 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Gregg Levine (22 Mar 2026 23:37 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Terrence Fugate (22 Mar 2026 23:43 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Jay P Hailey (23 Mar 2026 00:17 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Gregg Levine (23 Mar 2026 02:15 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Jon Crocker (23 Mar 2026 20:14 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Terrence Fugate (24 Mar 2026 18:40 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? David Johnson (22 Mar 2026 23:01 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Terrence Fugate (22 Mar 2026 23:20 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? David Sooby (23 Mar 2026 00:06 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? Terrence Fugate (23 Mar 2026 01:07 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? dbernat (24 Mar 2026 00:01 UTC)

Beam's "girls" (was: Why do we read Piper's works?) David Johnson (24 Mar 2026 00:29 UTC)

Piper and 1960's sexism (was: Re: Why do we read Piper's works?) David Sooby (24 Mar 2026 01:08 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Piper and 1960's sexism dbernat (24 Mar 2026 05:50 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Piper and 1960's sexism (was: Re: Why do we read Piper's works?) David Johnson (24 Mar 2026 06:19 UTC)

Re: [HBP] Why do we read Piper's works? David Johnson (23 Mar 2026 01:57 UTC)

Re: [HBP] October 1962 Jay P Hailey 23 Mar 2026 00:15 UTC

> I probably need to get with my older sister and write our memories down
> for posterity.  An 11- and 13-year-old probably had a unique perspective.

Agreed!