Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? | Simplelists

FTL Drive, here we come? David Shaw (19 Apr 2017 15:34 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Jeffrey Schwartz (19 Apr 2017 22:34 UTC)

(missing)

(missing)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Richard Aiken (19 Apr 2017 23:30 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? C. Berry (19 Apr 2017 22:39 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Jeffrey Schwartz (19 Apr 2017 23:32 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? C. Berry (19 Apr 2017 23:42 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Richard Aiken (20 Apr 2017 01:04 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Tim (20 Apr 2017 04:10 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Tim (20 Apr 2017 02:43 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Richard Aiken (20 Apr 2017 02:59 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Tim (20 Apr 2017 04:14 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Richard Aiken (19 Apr 2017 23:24 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? shadow@xxxxxx (20 Apr 2017 15:40 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Richard Aiken (20 Apr 2017 17:38 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Tim (21 Apr 2017 02:41 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Richard Aiken (21 Apr 2017 03:13 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Richard Aiken (21 Apr 2017 03:18 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Richard Aiken (21 Apr 2017 03:27 UTC)

Re: [TML] FTL Drive, here we come? Tim 20 Apr 2017 04:14 UTC

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:59:24PM -0400, Richard Aiken wrote:
> While it may be inaccurate in it's wording, what the article actually said
> was that when the atoms were released from the supercooled laser trap, they
> expanded and "some displayed negative mass."

Yes, it means that for the purposes of that particular experimental
setup, they behaved in a very limited way as something of negative
mass would have behaved.

- Tim