Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!

It's a BIG one! Phil Pugliese (13 Apr 2017 18:59 UTC)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Kurt Feltenberger (13 Apr 2017 19:56 UTC)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Postmark (14 Apr 2017 22:38 UTC)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Rupert Boleyn (14 Apr 2017 22:50 UTC)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Bruce Johnson (14 Apr 2017 23:27 UTC)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Charles Brogdon (14 Apr 2017 23:16 UTC)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Bruce Johnson (14 Apr 2017 23:25 UTC)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Rupert Boleyn (15 Apr 2017 00:01 UTC)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Michael Houghton (14 Apr 2017 23:50 UTC)

(missing)

(missing)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Richard Aiken (19 Apr 2017 00:29 UTC)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Rupert Boleyn (19 Apr 2017 00:59 UTC)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Richard Aiken (19 Apr 2017 01:13 UTC)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Rupert Boleyn 19 Apr 2017 00:59 UTC

On 19Apr2017 1229, Richard Aiken wrote:
> That is my understanding as well. The commentator  I heard said that all
> the oxygen in the radius of effect is consumed in less than a second.
> Essentially, it's intended to smother every dug-in enemy within reach at
> once.

The MOABs are conventional bombs, so they don't consume the local
oxygen. For that you should use a fuel-air/thermobaric weapon.

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief