On Mon, 30 Mar 2026 08:17:43 +0000, Timothy Collinson wrote:

>Many thanks for this Jeff, great to see it at last!  Well done.
>
>Couple of things:
>
> * the contents page on the website inflicts my confession on poor Jo who
>   hasn't done anything to deserve that.  The contents pages in the A4/US
>   Letter PDFs are correct.

> * the contents page on the website spells 'Temporomorbidia' incorrectly,
>   it's also wrong on the contents page of the PDF; it's correct on the
>   actual article head.

The website has been corrected for both of the above. The PDFs won't be,
because if I do, the links to the specific PDFs get broken because of the
way Google generates the links.

>The latter is moderately amusing to me as Martin and I came up with the
>idea for the article about this time last year [1] and the article was
>called 'Chronopathy' for virtually all that time.  At the last minute,
>noting that 'chronopathy' is a real thing and something else entirely, Dr M
>decided he preferred the longer/less easy title which I didn't absolutely
>love (although I've got used to it [2]) but have adopted - what's the point
>of asking the advice of a doctor and then not taking it?!

For what it's worth, tc and I discussed this before the article was
printed; quoting from my comment to him about this:

 || I think the difference actually ends up coming down to a preference of
 || Greek vs. Latin, and the impression I get is that the biological
 || sciences generally prefer Latin for naming (although for non-naming
 || contexts, Greek may be acceptable, thus "pathology" rather than
 || "morbology" [note that Latin adopted the -logia suffix from Greek
 || unchanged]) , so "tempus" rather than "chronos", and "morbus" rather
 || than "pathos".

>But thank you Jeff and all the best - I'd better let the Boys from the
>Baltic Star know the AAR has seen light of day.  I think they thought I'd
>not bothered...

You can also tell them that I concede that it's strictly _mea_ culpa, not
_you_; the failure is entirely on me for my organizational skills. Or lack
thereof.

>Wikipedia: A Church of England churchwarden is a senior lay volunteer
>elected to help manage a parish, acting as a key representative of the
>laity and a principal advisor to the vicar. Similar to a senior warden in
>an American Episcopal church, they are responsible for church property,
>maintenance, and ensuring orderly services, acting as trustees.

For what it's worth, the only reason that the Episcopal Church exists here
is because at one point there were perceived potential loyalty issues among
members of the Armed Forces or in elective positions of Government with
accepting the English/British Crown as secular head of the Church.
Functionally and organizationally, it's basically just the Church of
England (also called the Anglican Church). For the most part, the Episcopal
Church is in communion with the rest of the Anglican Communion (although I
believe that the rest of the Communion holds it to be 'impaired' because of
certain decisions regarding the status of congregants who are other than
strictly heterosexual. I do recall that the U.S. Episcopal Church was
specifically asked not to particpate [attendance was permitted] in the most
recent Lambeth Conference [or perhaps it was the one before]).

®Traveller is a registered trademark of
Mongoose Publishing, 1977-2026. Use of
the trademark in this notice and in the
referenced materials is not intended to
infringe or devalue the trademark.

--
Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
Freelance Traveller
    The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource
xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
http://www.freelancetraveller.com

Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
enterprises for hosting services:

onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io)