Re: [TML]Pong | Simplelists

Re: [TML]Pong George Herbert (15 Mar 2016 00:35 UTC)

Re: [TML]Pong Mark Urbin (15 Mar 2016 18:46 UTC)

Re: [TML]Pong Jeffrey Schwartz (15 Mar 2016 19:05 UTC)

Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Greg Nokes (15 Mar 2016 19:57 UTC)

Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Bruce Johnson (15 Mar 2016 20:11 UTC)

Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Grimmund (16 Mar 2016 02:36 UTC)

Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Richard Aiken (25 Mar 2016 00:14 UTC)

Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Jeffrey Schwartz (15 Mar 2016 20:12 UTC)

Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Bruce Johnson (15 Mar 2016 20:31 UTC)

Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Richard Aiken (25 Mar 2016 00:20 UTC)

Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Jeffrey Schwartz (25 Mar 2016 13:21 UTC)

Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Ethan McKinney (24 Mar 2016 22:54 UTC)

Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Grimmund (25 Mar 2016 14:43 UTC)

Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Greg Nokes (25 Mar 2016 20:05 UTC)

Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Richard Aiken (26 Mar 2016 03:39 UTC)

Re: [TML]Pong Richard Aiken (16 Mar 2016 04:47 UTC)

Re: [TML]Pong George Herbert 15 Mar 2016 00:35 UTC

The current consensus is that tiny Cf micronukes will be more like 20-25mm projectiles but might well work.  The ones that small would be horribly dangerously radioactive to have around and would decay rapidly barring convenient damper tech like Traveller supposes...

George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone