|
FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
Freelance Traveller
(15 Nov 2015 02:40 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(15 Nov 2015 15:33 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
Tim
(15 Nov 2015 23:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(16 Nov 2015 02:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(16 Nov 2015 03:22 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Freelance Traveller (21 Nov 2015 02:45 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
William Ewing
(16 Nov 2015 00:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
Freelance Traveller
(21 Nov 2015 02:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
William Ewing
(21 Nov 2015 07:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
Freelance Traveller
(21 Nov 2015 19:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
William Ewing
(21 Nov 2015 23:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
Freelance Traveller
(21 Nov 2015 02:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
Kurt Feltenberger
(16 Nov 2015 02:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
Freelance Traveller
(21 Nov 2015 02:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
Freelance Traveller
(21 Nov 2015 05:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(21 Nov 2015 13:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
Jim Vassilakos
(21 Nov 2015 20:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
Freelance Traveller
(21 Nov 2015 23:07 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers
Freelance Traveller
(21 Nov 2015 23:45 UTC)
|
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 10:50:14 +1100, Tim <xxxxxx@little-possums.net> wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 03:33:44PM +0000, xxxxxx@comcast.net wrote:
>> In the section of "What Is Dream Walking?" four types are identified the
>> first sentence of "What Can Dream Walkers Do?"
>The word "type" doesn't quite fit either: they're more like degrees of
>capability, with higher degrees subsuming all of the abilities of any
>lower degrees.
Yes, this is an accurate statement. I wasn't sure what to call them;
both 'levels' and 'degrees' make it sound like something that one could
progress through, with an Observer eventually being able to become a
Visitor, then a Bender, then ultimately a Weaver - but I don't want that
implication; there is no progression: Once a Bender, always a Bender.
Given that, the most 'unloaded' word I could come up with was 'type'. So
that's what I used.
And yes, Weaver abilities subsume Bender abilities subsume Visitor
abilities subsume Observer abilities; I don't think it makes sense for
them not to.
--
Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
Freelance Traveller
The Electronic Fan-Supported
Traveller® Fanzine and Resource
xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
http://www.freelancetraveller.com
http://freelancetraveller.downport.com/
®Traveller is a registered trademark of
Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2014. Use of
the trademark in this notice and in the
referenced materials is not intended to
infringe or devalue the trademark.
Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
enterprises for hosting services:
CyberNET Web Hosting (http://www.cyberwebhosting.net)
The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)