On 7/5/25 06:35, James Catchpole - jlcatchpole at googlemail.com (via tml list) wrote: > Are you forgetting all the hours you spent running TTA online? Or does > it only count if it's sitting around the same table? 😆 > > <snip> > In any case, if you actually look at the hours I've spent running > games, I think you'd be surprised how few they are. Isn't it > supposed to 10,000 hours or something to get to mastery? If we > call it an average of 4 hours per game, that's going to be 2500 > games. IF I ran three at TravCon (which I've done but is > demanding) and, say one other f2f in the year, and perhaps half a > dozen online in the year, that would 250 years of refereeing at my > pace... > > I've done what, 15 of those 250? (Plus a few rarities back in the > 80s/90s). I'd better make the anagathics of Batch 24381 real. > > The lack of experience is probably why I'm already beginning to > get jitters about running Batch 24381 at North Star on Sunday. > I've not run anything since the start of Covid (TravCon 2020) > except for Batch 24381 at TravCon last October. And it didn't fit > into four hours there. North Star is only giving me three! > (But there's some stuff I can chuck out and we won't have the Lego > to distract us (the Artemis base and Artemis rover) as I sold them > at the end of TravCon. Sadly.) > > tc > I doubt just "physically around the same table" is the only one that counts. Parental Advisory ran, roughly weekly, from just before the COVID-19 pandemic to just under 2 years afterwards, and I reported it here at the time. Like so many groups, that one was all online. We'd been doing it that way for a few years by then. MOst of the list seemed to at least passively tolerate it, if not enjoy it. Collision, _not only_ do you have the brute accumulated experience (however much that is), you're one up on me. You've also been _reflecting_ on your experiences bi-monthly for _how_ many years now? As for the jitters re: running Batch 24381, would it help airing them either here, or directly in a private email? On upside, you've run it once previously, and at least have an experience-informed idea of the good, bad, fast and slow bits from that previous run. Maybe make some notes from your previous run - not only bits you "can chuck out", but bits you can skim thru if needed. You've got more experience running con games than I have, so if you think this suggestion is bollocks, don't do it, but maybe go lighter on / faster through the setup bits to leave time for the PCs to show off at the climax? Alex