Re: [TML] Question Kurt Feltenberger 17 Jun 2015 03:40 UTC

On 6/16/2015 11:32 PM, Greg Chalik wrote:
> The biggest problem for the F-35 is the pursuit of 'advanced
> technology' which is often immature and therefore creates significant
> additional developmental costs from the supplier chain. This is one of
> the issues I have always had in Traveller advanced vs appropriate
> technology use. Most engineers that work based on delivering products
> which work on budget, on time and to specified requirements don't
> pursue such design goals. US DoD is uneconomic in a very
> counter-engineering practice way. But, Traveller, conceived during and
> after the Vietnam War is exuberant over this unsustainable approach to
> capability delivery.

I disagree.  In Traveller, there really is nothing new with regards to
the technology in use.  Tech level 15 has been around for centuries, or
longer, and the other tech levels are common and stratified to the point
where there's really no difference between a Tech 10 widget from the
Imperium and a Tech 10 widget that does the same exact thing from the
Sword Worlds, Zho, Vargr, Aslan, or other major group.

I see Traveller technology as not really technology race, but rather an
clever configuration and use race.  Who can use what's there the most
effective and creatively to gain an edge over someone who has pretty
much the exact same thing.

--
Kurt Feltenberger
xxxxxx@thepaw.org/xxxxxx@yahoo.com
“Before today, I was scared to live, after today, I'm scared I'm not
living enough." - Me