|
Campaign writeups
Alex Goodwin
(18 May 2020 13:20 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Timothy Collinson
(18 May 2020 13:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Jeff Zeitlin
(18 May 2020 13:47 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Timothy Collinson
(18 May 2020 14:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Bruce Johnson
(19 May 2020 23:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(20 May 2020 03:08 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Timothy Collinson
(22 May 2020 11:29 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Jeff Zeitlin
(22 May 2020 15:44 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Timothy Collinson
(22 May 2020 15:56 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(22 May 2020 16:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups Jeff Zeitlin (22 May 2020 16:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Timothy Collinson
(22 May 2020 17:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Jeff Zeitlin
(22 May 2020 18:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Timothy Collinson
(22 May 2020 18:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Phil Pugliese
(18 May 2020 14:04 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Thomas RUX
(18 May 2020 19:24 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Timothy Collinson
(18 May 2020 19:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Thomas RUX
(18 May 2020 20:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(18 May 2020 21:55 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Timothy Collinson
(19 May 2020 07:58 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
Jeff Zeitlin
(19 May 2020 09:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Campaign writeups
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(20 May 2020 05:40 UTC)
|
On Fri, 22 May 2020 16:55:41 +0100, Timothy Collinson - timothy.collinson
at port.ac.uk (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote to Freelance
Traveller:
>100-200 words?! Nice and vague.
Well, the way MS Word counts words, and the way typing tests compute
words-per-minute, use radically different definitions of "word". Since no
one definition of "word" is necessarily satisfactory for all usages, any
estimate of word count is going to have to be vague.
I figured that the typical word was between five and ten characters
(letters) in length; 200 words at 5 characters is 1K; 100 words at 10
characters is 1K. Assuming completely raw/unformatted text...
Formatted documents - whether Word, Wordperfect, RTF, HTML, etc., have some
overhead for the formatting, so you need to figure the low end for word
count. The less overhead a format has, the higher your words-per-kilobyte
will be, but the less 'fancy stuff' you can do. Markdown/CommonMark format,
for example, has very little overhead, and so will come in closer to 200
WPK, but limits formatting to essentially headers, bold/italic/both,
numbered/bulleted lists, and fixed/variable pitch. Word processor formats
and PDF have high overhead, and thus come in closer to 100 WPK, but allow a
lot more control over the appearance of the text.
It starts getting even more complicated when you ship compressed files
around; different formats have different compression limits, and those are
more tied to _how_the_overhead_is_implemented_ rather than _how_much_
overhead there is. Formats that are implementable in pure ASCII or the
lower half of ISO-8859 will typically compress at about 16:1; some
word-processor formats, like OpenOffice, may compress very little or not at
all because they're already compressed.
®Traveller is a registered trademark of
Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2020. Use of
the trademark in this notice and in the
referenced materials is not intended to
infringe or devalue the trademark.
--
Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
Freelance Traveller
The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource
xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
http://www.freelancetraveller.com
Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
enterprises for hosting services:
onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io)
The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)