|
[TML] Nuclear Salt Water Rocket
Richard Aiken
(11 Mar 2019 05:15 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Nuclear Salt Water Rocket shadow@xxxxxx (30 Mar 2019 04:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Nuclear Salt Water Rocket
Richard Aiken
(30 Mar 2019 06:13 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Nuclear Salt Water Rocket
Thomas Jones-Low
(30 Mar 2019 12:26 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Nuclear Salt Water Rocket
Richard Aiken
(30 Mar 2019 23:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Nuclear Salt Water Rocket
Thomas Jones-Low
(31 Mar 2019 00:18 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] Nuclear Salt Water Rocket
Richard Aiken
(01 Apr 2019 21:54 UTC)
|
On 11 Mar 2019 at 1:15, Richard Aiken wrote: > http://www.projectrho.com/public_html/rocket/enginelist.php#id--Nuclea > r_Thermal--Gas_Core--Open_Cycle--Nuclear_Salt_Water > > I am thinking that this would be just the thing for a > Flash-Gordon-style "atomic rocket ship." Unfortunately, I don't have > enough math to understand the calculations, so I was hoping someone on > the list could let me know how to model one of these, in terms of the > simple Book 1 Classic Traveller shipbuilding rules. The exhaust will make environmentalists cringe. > By the way, since the rocket's fuel is stored in discrete > small-diameter tubes to prevent inadvertent critical mass, battle > damage would result in [according to the website author] "a nuclear > explosion inside the ship." But since the fuel only explodes upon > reaching critical mass, if one were to thread the tubes throughout the > outer layer of hull and equip each line segment it's own explosive > reactive armor [to expell and scatter the fuel from the damaged line > before it could react], you should be able to prevent uncontrolled > reaction. Critical mass depends on shape. *Strongly*. Some day I gotta find the issue of Analog from the early 60s that has a fact aarticle about it and scan it. I've got it, it's just buried in storage. In a liquid, density has effects as well. I'd be really worried about compression waves in that "salt water" setting off a chain reaction. Just venting the fluid should do. It'll scatter rapidly. Also, as the water evaporates, that makes it *harder* for a reaction to occur (the water acts as a moderator, slowing neutrons which increases the reaction rate. Leaks inside are a problem because they can form "puddles" whose shape and volume would cause chain reactions. Mind you, without some sort of confinement, you won't get a "boom". at most a "squib" explosion that would scatter the fuel. More like a quick boil and a radiation flash that could be really bad for equipment and personnel. -- Leonard Erickson (aka shadow) shadow at shadowgard dot com