SDB and system defense organization
Joe Coles
(14 Jan 2019 03:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] SDB and system defense organization
Rupert Boleyn
(14 Jan 2019 05:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] SDB and system defense organization
Evyn MacDude
(15 Jan 2019 03:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] SDB and system defense organization
Tim
(15 Jan 2019 10:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] SDB and system defense organization
Phil Pugliese
(15 Jan 2019 19:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] SDB and system defense organization shadow@xxxxxx (18 Jan 2019 16:39 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] SDB and system defense organization
Catherine Berry
(18 Jan 2019 19:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] SDB and system defense organization
Rupert Boleyn
(18 Jan 2019 23:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] SDB and system defense organization
Richard Aiken
(23 Jan 2019 23:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] SDB and system defense organization
Richard Aiken
(23 Jan 2019 23:56 UTC)
|
On 15 Jan 2019 at 21:58, Tim wrote: > If the system is balkanized or has other internal problems then they > might be protecting from each other as much or more than any external > threats. And woe unto any "pirates"/mercenaries who think this makes for easy pickings. While it's unlikely that you'll get the "ideal" of everybody shelving their differences until the invaders are kicked out, you'll likely get a fair bit of it. And then thnere are the folks who will side with the invaders if they think it'll give them an dvantage. they may stick with them. Or they may turn around and pull a backstab if *that* looks to be to their advantage. (also givesd them plausible deniability. "Oh no, we just sided with them to gain their trust so we could attack when it would do the most good") -- Leonard Erickson (aka shadow) shadow at shadowgard dot com