NSW is a borderline case. While the regulatory framework is extremely light handed, there are still restrictions on soliciting and living off the earnings of prostitution is still illegal. The location of brothels is also more restrictive. Street work is restricted by law rather than custom. The main difference is the restrictions are imposed at the central level rather than by local authorities and they're more stringent. NSW is best regarded as almost complete decriminalization while NZ has gone the whole way.

NSW definitely served as the model for complete decriminalization but NZ is usually regarded as the only example of full decriminalization with no restrictions on workers. The only real limits in NZ are mandatory safe sex, the ban on overseas and underage workers. The NZPC is working on the removal of the ban on overseas workers as these still exist and these are still subject to high levels of exploitation.

On 15 Oct 2017 2:29 pm, "Tim" <xxxxxx@little-possums.net> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:07:56PM +1300, Andrea Vallance wrote:
> This is the vast difference between legalisation and decriminalisation. In
> decriminalisation pimping becomes far less of an issue (it counts as
> coercion and sex workers are far more likely to feel free to go to the
> police) and there's no licensing or mandatory health checks. However this
> model currently only exists in New Zealand. However yeah, freelance has far
> greater issues with problem clients.

I had thought that New South Wales in Australia had decriminalized
prostitution.  The Scarlet Alliance (Australian Sex Workers
Association) website appears to back this up.  What are the major
differences between the NSW and New Zealand laws that make New Zealand
the only true decriminalized model in the world?


- Tim
-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please go to
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=P3BA2UIZz1d611PMTCfKBtnoM7mx8DTJ