On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 7:34 PM, C. Berry <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
I like that for the cinematics, but a ship that relies on turbojets to achieve escape velocity is going to be unable to take off from a vacuum (or even non-oxygen-atmosphere) world -- which again plays hell with canon in general, and the various design sequences in particular.


Naw.

My manuever thrusters are multi-mode nacelles, with the bit turning the fan blades being a small reactor incorporated into each nacelle. Over the course of a flight from surface to orbit/jump point, the nacelles transition from working as turofans to turbojets to ramjets to scramjets and finally - when the atmosphere becomes too thin to provide reaction mass  - to a fusion rockets (e.g. water from fuel tanks is vaporized into combustion chambers in the reactors).

Type of atmosphere doesn't matter, although fuel economy is substantially greater in an oxygen one and using the "lower" forms of thruster in a corrosive 

--
Richard Aiken

"Never insult anyone by accident."  Robert A. Heinlein
"I studied the Koran a great deal. I came away from that study with the conviction there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as Muhammed." Alexis de Tocqueville (1843)
"We know a little about a lot of things; just enough to make us dangerous." Dean Winchester
"It has been my experience that a gun doesn't care who pulls its trigger." Newton Knight (as portrayed by Matthew McConaughey), to a scoffing Confederate tax collector facing the weapons held by Knight's young children and wife.

Virus-free. www.avast.com