Craig, are you still in L.A.?

On Oct 14, 2016 4:31 PM, "C. Berry" <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

There are helipads atop at least a few tall buildings around LA. I used to fly on Rockwell's employee shuttle helicopters to get between the far-flung offices in Southern California; needless to say, this was one of my favorite parts of working there. :) There was one office tower a mile or so south of LAX that had a roof helipad on which we landed a few times. The top of a skyscraper looks about four feet wide when you're sliding all too rapidly down to land on it. It's even more fun when there's a crosswind. I'm very proud that my pants remained unstained during those landings.

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Jonathan Clark <xxxxxx@att.net> wrote:

Graham Donald wrote:

      I was just poking around the internet and stumbled across a blog that in part covers unbuilt
    structures intended for London. One of these was a 1950s proposal for an office building that
    incorporated a heliport.It is a striking structure, but it also seems perfect (If plan drawings
    still survive or can be freelanced...) for use in a Traveller scenario.

Interesting drawings - reminded me of Cordwainer Smith's Earthport.
See eg http://www.fourth-millennium.net/ (a site to spend several hours at, if you're
a Smith fan).

My real comment was that half (from casual visual inspection) of the skyscrapers in present-day
Tokyo have helipads on them, and they are basically built directly on top of the buildings or
projecting from the roofs - no big separate towers. IIRC helipads were/are encouraged/mandated by
the building codes, for the use of emergency services for building evacuations. Most of them have
never been used for anything. Yet.

Apparently Los Angeles used to have a similar requirement, but dropped it in 2014. There's
a helipad on top of the Burj Al Arab hotel.

Certainly once you get to grav vehicle tech (dragging this back to Traveller), you could easily
have the executive entrance to your office building on the 99th floor, or whatever. Grav vehicles
(at least IMTU, yours may vary, and it may make for a decent discussion) have no dangerous whirly
things on them, and no nasty exhaust fumes, so there's no obvious reason to keep them separated
from people walking around.

Jonathan

-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please goto http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=PltOdItWBSgOP4y0Q6abkGbDI1eus0lz

--

"Eternity is in love with the productions of time." - William Blake

-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please goto 
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=gi277fSUTkyFeQYIkUkn6zf5f3dXCa4l

-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please goto 
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=PltOdItWBSgOP4y0Q6abkGbDI1eus0lz