I refered to Bruce's advice.

And the reason just about every thread ends like this is because I choose not to politely excuse myself when my intelligence is insulted by a certain 'tag team' here.

I know what I know, and you, or anyone else, would need good rational, evidence-based, arguments to convince me otherwise, not sloganisms and personal beliefs, all of which are falsifiable.

On 5 June 2016 at 11:08, Kurt Feltenberger <xxxxxx@thepaw.org> wrote:

On 6/4/16 8:56 PM, Greg Chalik wrote:

Kurt, I don't remeber a group rule that said only those on your esteemed intellectual level are allowed to respond.

As for "blathering", you could have responded by offering a rational reason for writing the second sentence in the earlier post.

No one has exactly the same World view, and less so if observed from York, PA.

And, I don't really care for your personal insults off the list either. Clearly, you have nothing else in store to say.

If you're accusing me of contacting you off list, you're barking up the wrong tree. This is the first time in ages that I've replied to one of your posts, and if anything was done off list before, I wasn't the one who started it. I have no trouble standing behind my comments and if you received something with my name on it off list recently, then it wasn't me.

Now who's resorting to the personal insults?

Just for the record, just about every thread I've seen you get involved with has ended up like this.

--
Kurt Feltenberger
xxxxxx@thepaw.org/xxxxxx@yahoo.com
“Before today, I was scared to live, after today, I'm scared I'm not living enough." - Me
----- The Traveller Mailing List Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com To unsubscribe from this list please goto http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=JydxSB9tZc6TS63HiAHJcg6SAwighNGJ