​ Actually no. WP forces effectively re-occupied Czechoslovakia and Hungary using the same 'theoretical' doctrine and equipment, and NATO wasn't able to do much about those operations.​
 

You're confusing military capability with political will.  NATO didn't do much largely because the US sat on its hands for fear of the Soviets going nuclear.

Kurt, I'm not confusing anything.

Political is that function of society that translates popular will of the demographic into action.
You mean the collective NATO leadership 'lacked balls', which I think is the technical term.

The execution of both operations was such that NATO wouldn't have been able to do much in any case.

Military capability comes in three mutually-dependent scopes, strategic, operational and tactical. The best tactical capability in the world, if strategically unusuable is so much scrap metal.

Why would anyone have thought that Soviets would 'go nuclear'?!
Since 1917 the Soviets were saying that their political goal is the liberation of the working people from the capitalists, not their irradiation for 300+ years

On 18 June 2015 at 12:51, Kurt Feltenberger <kurt@thepaw.org> wrote:
On 6/17/2015 10:44 PM, Greg Chalik wrote:
​ Actually no. WP forces effectively re-occupied Czechoslovakia and Hungary using the same 'theoretical' doctrine and equipment, and NATO wasn't able to do much about those operations.​
 

You're confusing military capability with political will.  NATO didn't do much largely because the US sat on its hands for fear of the Soviets going nuclear.

--
Kurt Feltenberger
kurt@thepaw.org/kfeltenberger@yahoo.com
“Before today, I was scared to live, after today, I'm scared I'm not living enough." - Me
-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to listmom@travellercentral.com
To unsubscribe from this list please goto 
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=JydxSB9tZc6TS63HiAHJcg6SAwighNGJ