This email was sent from yahoo.com which does not allow forwarding of emails via email lists. Therefore the sender's email address (philpugliese@yahoo.com) has been replaced with a dummy one. The original message follows:
I've read in more than one book that original Sherman's had a 75mm gun which was found to be inadequate & was soon replaced w/ the 3" gun.
It was even reflected in some 70's era tactical wargames.
One in particular, as I recall, was 'Tank' published by SPI around 1973, I believe.
I also don't believe that he Sherman was ready to go in 1941.
Weren't we still supplying the Grant/Lee to the brits in 1942?
--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 6/16/15, Greg Chalik <mrg3105@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [TML] Question
To: "tml@simplelists.com" <tml@simplelists.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015, 8:51 PM
On 17 June 2015 at 11:54,
Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <nobody@simplelists.com>
wrote:
17pdr
gun
The M4 did
not have a wimpy 75mm gun in 1941.
The Ordnance
QF 17pdr wasn't available until 1943.
Integrating a
new weapon into an existing tank design is not what most
engineers would advise since the costs can be quite
prohibitive.
The thinking
in the US was that the the M26 was going to be ready
'any day now', which didn't happen.
The thinking
in the UK was that the Centurion 'universal' tank
wasn't going to be ready in time, so a LIMITED
conversion program was a reasonable accounting risk.
Israelis faced
the same choice in the 50s when converting the same Shermans
to the M50/51 spec.
Greg
-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to listmom@travellercentral.com
To unsubscribe from this list please goto
http://archives.simplelists.com
-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to listmom@travellercentral.com
To unsubscribe from this list please goto
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=JydxSB9tZc6TS63HiAHJcg6SAwighNGJ