The M-4, named General Sherman in UK under Lend Lease, was 'designed' in about three months largely by redesigning the M-3, designated as General Lee (with US -pattern turret) by the British Army. The 75mm gun was mounted for two reasons: it was in production, and there was ample ammunition available for it. There was an urgent need for better tanks than the M-3 Lee/Grant in North Africa.

It isn't much good to put a weapon into a tank that hadn't actually been tested. Testing of the M1 gun identified that the turret needed a counterweight, requiring adoption of a different turret design to that of the M-4 initial production.

Of course in Traveller highr TLs the modelling and simulation technology would allow for a design process that gets all engineering right from the word Go

On 17 June 2015 at 21:59, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <nobody@simplelists.com> wrote:
This email was sent from yahoo.com which does not allow forwarding of emails via email lists. Therefore the sender's email address (philpugliese@yahoo.com) has been replaced with a dummy one. The original message follows:

I've read in more than one book that original Sherman's had a 75mm gun which was found to be inadequate & was soon replaced w/ the 3" gun.
It was even reflected in some 70's era tactical wargames.
One in particular, as I recall, was 'Tank' published by SPI around 1973, I believe.
I also don't believe that he Sherman was ready to go in 1941.
Weren't we still supplying the Grant/Lee to the brits in 1942?

--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 6/16/15, Greg Chalik <mrg3105@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [TML] Question
 To: "tml@simplelists.com" <tml@simplelists.com>
 Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2015, 8:51 PM


 On 17 June 2015 at 11:54,
 Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <nobody@simplelists.com>
 wrote:
 17pdr
 gun

 ​The M4 did
 not have a wimpy 75mm gun in 1941.
 The Ordnance
 QF 17pdr ​wasn't available until 1943.
 Integrating a
 new weapon into an existing tank design is not what most
 engineers would advise since the costs can be quite
 prohibitive.
 The thinking
 in the US was that the the M26 was going to be ready
 'any day now', which didn't happen.
 The thinking
 in the UK was that the Centurion 'universal' tank
 wasn't going to be ready in time, so a LIMITED
 conversion program was a reasonable accounting risk.
 Israelis faced
 the same choice in the 50s when converting the same Shermans
 to the M50/51 spec.

 Greg


 -----
 The Traveller Mailing List
 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
 Report problems to listmom@travellercentral.com
 To unsubscribe from this list please goto
 http://archives.simplelists.com
-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to listmom@travellercentral.com
To unsubscribe from this list please goto
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=JydxSB9tZc6TS63HiAHJcg6SAwighNGJ