Sorry about the miss spelling of Derek. I am in need of new glasses apparently.
 
I may have missed the reply about a question concerning jammers asked a couple of posts in the past.
 
Specifically, I asked about radio and area jammers.
 
Per TNE FF&S p. 53 there are four  types of jammer. The jammers are Radio, RADAR, EMS, and Area.
 
AT TL-9 the only way to jam a radio is by using a radio jammer and only a RADAR jammer can degrade Radar.
 
When TL-10 rolls in the options are radio, RADAR, EMS, and Area jammers. In this case Radio can be jammed by EMS
and Area jammers. Radar and AEMS can be degraded using a Radar jammer. The EMS or Area jammer is effective
against radio, radar, and AEMS.
 
Do the TL-9 military packages include a radio jammer?
 
Was the Area jammer considered for use in the QSDS?
 
Tom Rux
 
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 5:04 PM
Subject: Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
 
Hi Derel, a.k.a Guy,
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Derek Wildstar
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 1:33 PM
To: tml@simplelists.com
Subject: Re: [TML] T4 QSDS Question: Sensors
 
> Tom,
 
> Yes, an identical redundant back-up should double the volume, price, and area requirements.  It probably also doubles the power consumption,
> although you could also argue that only one of the two systems needs to be powered-up at any given time.
 
I am in agreement with the volume and price increasing by the number of back-ups installed.
 
Light bulb turns, okay in my case a stick caught fire, the active sensors are using a bunch of small antenna spaced along the hull to
create the illusion of a single large antenna.
 
Increasing the power requirement when adding a back-up system keeps calculations simple and will save time in having to go back and fix
my spreadsheet.
 
Okay active sensors with back-ups double everything, except crew and USD.
 
> As far as which sensor got the back-up, I don't know.  I suspect the AEMS was redundant, since it is a search sensor and the LIDAR isn't.  My
> suggestion would be to try it - the AEMS and LIDAR systems likely have different volume, area, power, and price requirements, and therefore you
> should come close to the published figures one way and be relatively far off if you go the other.
 
I’ll agree that at TL-10 the AEMS is the system that has the back-up since it has the best short range of 480,000 km which is 180,000 km longer
than a LADAR/LIDAR.
 
Unfortunately, I apparently forgot to mention that my question was for the TL-9 Medium Military Sensor package that has RADAR and LADAR/LIDAR active sensors. The Active sensor USD of 4 appears to be for a LADAR/LIDAR system with a short range of 120,000 km. The radar’s best short range is
60,000 km which would result in an active USD of 2.
 
I was not able to recreate the TL-9 Medium Military sensor package in the QSDS 1.5e table by having two RADAR and 1 LADAR/LIDAR or
1 RADAR/2 LADAR/LIDAR systems using either a fixed or folding array, which prompted my question.
 
My guess is the LADAR/LIDAR has the back-up since the HRT has the range to pick-up a target.
 
Thank you for the help, back to work.
 
> ---Guy "wildstar" Garnett
> wildstar@prismnet.com
 
Tom Rux
-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to listmom@travellercentral.com
To unsubscribe from this list please goto 
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=zZOCJCw2BI9jPrGTB4OJoibiHbbTEiok