Hello all,

 

Hopefully I have better luck with answers to my questions than I’ve had on COTI. Please accept my apologies for posting to more than on forum.

 

How was the Standard Hull Configurations Armor USD factor determined?

 

I’ve tested the standard hull configurations table using TNE FF&S Mk 1 Mod 0 with my results at worst being plus or minus 0.5 from those in the table. With the exception of the Armor  values. Per TNE FF&S the minimum armor value is 10 x the maximum acceleration in Gs a vessel can pull.

 

My testing using TNE FF&S has matched the numbers for the Jump Drive, HEPlaR Drive, Thrust Plate Drive, Standard Civilian Controls, and Standard Military Controls.

 

The TL 9 Basic Sensor system I’m a bit off on the Volume in displacement tons and cost. My Volume calculations for cubic meters add up to 14 m^3, however when I round the radar processor and antenna to the first decimal place my number matches the one on the Standard Sensor table. The cost I get is 13.8 versus 13.5 which I thinks is due to the radar’s antenna cost not being included. The cost requirement for the radar is part of the Consolidated TNE Errata.

 

On the Standard Sensor Systems table the USD column has the following entry: TL 9 Basic Sensor System USD A0 P2 J0. I believe I’ve figured out the active sensor is a radar (A) with a range of  300 km and the 0 (zero) is the result of dividing 300 by 30,000. The Passive (P)sensor is a HRT with a 60,000 km range which translates to 60,000/30,000 = 2. Unfortunately the Sensors write-up does not, that I can tell anyway, mention anything about jammers (J) being installed except in the Standard Sensors Table.

 

Have I made the right conclusion on the active and passive bits of data?

 

How was the Jammer data calculated?

 

Thank you for any help that can be provided,

 

Tom Rux