On 19 April 2015 at 13:23, <tmr0195@comcast.net> wrote:
Top of my morning Timothy,
 
 
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2015 3:47 AM
Subject: Re: [TML] Re[2]: [TML] Dark River
 

>>I have a separate box easily accessible that has my first edition LBB and the Best of JTAS #1 in which I found a two magazines and a
 
>I've been digging through some of the bankers boxes on my shelves and being reminded about treasures too.  Always fun!  Had completely forgotten I >had issues 3-6 of _Jumpspace_ which I was only wondering about yesterday.
 
The furthest I have gotten is the easily accessible box, the other box in my room is buried under a layer or two of books.


Ooooh, layers.  I love rooms (or bookshops - very rare these days) which have *layers*.  (I used to haunt an old old bookshop near where I used to work at lunchtimes.  It was great for old paperback SF novels.  I would surreptitiously put them in author order when I had time.  (It did me a favour and helped next time I was looking for something).

 
Now I’m really looking forward to the next editions of the bibliographies.

Don't hold your breath.  They'll be years away at best.  Unless of course the CFS does put me out of a (real) job...
 
 
>But thanks for spotting them both.  Always happy to hear of material I might not have or might not know about.  I appreciate it's a mug's game, but >would like to *think* my bibliographies were as exhaustive as they could be.  It's quite interesting looking at the liminal items and considering why >things make the cut (or don't).
 
I have found that your bibliographies are extremely good for finding Traveller material in my collection. Thank you for putting them together, which has saved me a lot of time looking up information.

Thank you for that.  It's what they're for!

 
My vote is to have a magazine/periodical bibliography covering as much of the old stuff as can be found. I noticed that achieve.org has  some Traveller magazines I never got to see back then. Of course some of the material I did see was not purchased sue to lack of funds.

OK, one vote for the slightly smaller job.

tc