On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Rob O'Connor <robocon@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
With regard to the beginning of this thread - the only way I can reconcile the concept of a carbon-silicone biochemical transition is something like this:

Some rare worlds have two biochemistries develop in parallel, rather than one type filling all available niches early in a world's history.

So the silicone-based life interacts sporadically with the carbon-based stuff e.g. silicone stuff is based underground, and quakes or volcanism allow contact with surface or ocean dwelling carbon-based life.

The real evolutionary action is evident at the level of micro-organisms - both in diversity and speed.

Multicellular life forms either develop symbiotic relationships, or die off from crippling autoimmune complications as a host tries to eject an intruder...


The original article includes something along these lines, but has the purely silicon early lifeforms beating out both the purely-carbon and the "compromise" (partly carbon, partly silicon) ones, due to better tolerance of the environmental conditions on Uller.

It's that "better tolerance" that seems to be the sticking point. One of the early posters (I think it was Tim) pointed out that this did not necessarily follow from simply being silicon-based.
 
--
Richard Aiken

"Never insult anyone by accident."  Robert A. Heinlein
"A word to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones that need the advice." - Bill Cosby
"We know a little about a lot of things; just enough to make us dangerous." Dean Winchester