On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Bruce Johnson <johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu> wrote:
Major powers will be 75-90% of the population, and will likely be relatively close to each other in population and TL.

Trying to emulate Earth might be problematic (China is the biggest, in terms of population, India is second, but any sane analysis of socioeconomic politics of the world would not place India as the 'second power’.) but this is a game, after all.


There's likely an optimum education vs. population level required to advance a polity's tech level (and thus world dominance). A large population that's poorly educated will actually be a drag on advancement, since you more-or-less have to advance the whole population at the same time. While you can boost the tech level of an elite in such a polity by importing the relevant tech, by definition this means that polity isn't on the cutting edge of development for that world. If you lack the educational infrastructure the next tech level (e.g. if most of your population are functionally peasants), you aren't getting anywhere fast. 

--
Richard Aiken

"Never insult anyone by accident."  Robert A. Heinlein
"A word to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones that need the advice." - Bill Cosby
"We know a little about a lot of things; just enough to make us dangerous." Dean Winchester