On Tuesday, 19 November 2019, 5:09:55 am AWST, David Jaques-Watson <xxxxxx@pcug.org.au> wrote:
Dear Folks –
Joshua kindly replied:
>Yes, using ? in UWPs and PBGs for unknown stats is supported. If
size/atm/hyd are ??? you'll get the * glyph.
I’m obviously doing something wrong. I’ve entered three versions (to see if
any of the combinations worked; the first line is to show that the “normal”
entry passes with a warning):
B0102 0902 X7B4000-0 Tp 011 Na
B0109 0909 X???000-0 ???
B0109 0909 X???000-0
B0109 0909 X??????-? ???
And get the following:
Hint: Parsing as: SEC (Legacy)
Warning: Missing code: Fl, line 1: B0102 0902 X7B4000-0 Tp
011 Na
Warning: Missing code: Ba, line 1: B0102 0902 X7B4000-0 Tp
011 Na
Error: SEC Parse, line 2: B0109 0909 X???000-0
???
Error: SEC Parse, line 3: B0109 0909 X???000-0
Error: SEC Parse, line 4: B0109 0909 X??????-?
???
3 errors, 2 warnings.
Can you tell me what I’m doing wrong?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
David "Hyphen" Jaques-Watson ..at.. Beowulf Down (Tavonni/Vilis/SM 1520)
"I file things in historical order, with a hashing algorithm of gravity"
-----
The Traveller Mailing List
To unsubscribe from this list please go to