On Monday, May 27, 2019, 11:47:19 PM MST, Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:


On 28May2019 1548, Richard Aiken wrote:

> BTW, the text of the Supplement 7 entry for the Type S says "[t]he
> staterooms [####] are large and spacious, an essential consideration when
> the crew may be forced to spend long hours together."
>
> Uh huh. :P

Given that there are four staterooms, and one person can operate the
ship, it's probably true - if you assume no more than four people, so
each gets a 'double' room to themselves. Heck, with only a few people
onboard the air filters will take that much longer to go bad as well.

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I always figured that, most of the time, a typical 'Type S' mission involved two scout 'partners' so 4 staterooms would actually be quite "roomy".
I also (& not just just for the Type S) have always given precedence to the deckplans & just figured that the artist's rendering was where the screw-up was.
I know, 'artistic license' & all that jazz but the Type S really does NOT need to look like a scaled-down SW Star Destroyer.
Now, the displacement issue is quite another thing. 
Do the deckplans fit the DT limit?
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------