Monica:

Our hospital library has depended on local donations and BackMed listserv for over a decade. Our budget for subscriptions is such that I cannot ask administration for additional money when a journal is available in electronic form [from an aggregator or publisher direct]. They want me to keep my budget under control, so I have heavily depended on building a print and electronic collection at the same time, to stretch my budget dollars. I would like to be entirely electronic, but I know that my budget would have to rise dramatically to even attempt that. So, if the hospital has to decide between buying a new MRI or letting me buy a lot of journals electronically, you can guess which route they will take.

Our print collection is used both by local clinicians and we also have become a resource for many Docline libraries, because we are FreeShare and have journals that often are only held by academic [ie charging] health libraries. I have only about 60 active subscriptions, but about 570 titles in SerHold. If a journal I have in print becomes open access, that journal becomes a target for paper recycling, but until then, the journal has informational value.

I have often benefitted from health science libraries that are downsizing their collections, and BackMed has been the place to find a lot of what we can use to fill in gaps. Not every hospital library has a huge journal budget [for print or electronic] and we have sent a good number of ‘common’ journals such as Jama and NEJM to libraries that depend on donations for those titles. I personally hope/believe that BackMed still serves a purpose for certain libraries, and it has literally saved this hospital thousands and thousands of dollars in print/electronic subscription costs……..all for the cost of shipping at USPS Library Mail rate, which is obviously a fraction of what a medical journal subscriptions cost at institutional rates. The downside to having a ‘print’ collections continues to be the trend for medical journals to include a portion of their articles as ‘electronic format’ only, and we often get ILL requests on Docline that should not have routed to us, except the requestor did not bother to specify the correct format to fill from [ie electronic].

Mark McKenney BS, MS, MLS

Medical Librarian – Tue, Thu, Fri – 8AM to 4PM.

[Mon, Wed library is staffed by Linda Ciavonne]

Dr E.H. Munro Medical Library

St Mary’s Hospital – the Regional Medical Center

2635 North 7^th Street

Grand Junction, CO 81501-1628

970-298-2171 Fax 970-298-7509

library@sclhs.net (accessible by BOTH library staff)

COUSMG libid XVY oclc

If it takes you more than 10 minutes to find anything, you are wasting time. Contact the Medical Library. Finding what you need, no matter how obscure, is what we do.

From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Judith Koveleskie
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 8:17 AM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] Filling in back issues of print journals?

I have been working with serials since 1997. I used to spend a great deal of time trying to complete volumes and acquire back issues mostly through BACKSERV. However, with the increase in electronic resources, I am not sure that this is still of value. Any gaps in the collection can be covered through interlibrary loan.

Now that we have online access, about 75% of our former print collection has been discarded. We stopped binding in 2008 and only kept issues in Princeton files because we predicted that most of the current collection would be replaced by online and that prediction has come true. Every time we acquire online access the print goes. This morning I am discarding back issues for 43 more titles.

Judith A. Koveleskie, MLIS, MA
Serials Librarian
Seton Hill University
Reeves Memorial Library
1 Seton Hill Drive
Greensburg, PA 15601-1548
kovelesk@setonhill.edu
724-838-7828
This document may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you received it in error, please contact the sender at once and destroy the document. The document may contain information subject to restrictions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Acts. Such information may not be disclosed or used in any fashion outside the scope of the service for which you are receiving the information.

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Miller, Abigail S <amiller@law.utexas.edu> wrote:

Hi Monica,

Our general rule of thumb is that we will bind titles incomplete if we have current online access. This includes binding titles as incomplete if they end in the middle of a volume. We circulate individual issues to faculty and that often leaves us with gaps. We used to re-bind the volume if a missing issue was returned, but these days we don’t even do that. We will just put a permanent barcode on the loose issue and shelve it after the bound volume if necessary.

We do try to bind complete things that would be unique to our collection, such as local newsletters or items published by the institution, since we may wind up being the only complete copy.

I hope this helps.

Abigail Miller

Interim Head of Technical Services

Tarlton Law Library | Jamail Center for Legal Research

The University of Texas School of Law

727 E. Dean Keeton Street | Austin, TX 78705-3224

amiller@law.utexas.edu

512-471-1507 | 512-471-0243 [Fax]

From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Monica Howell
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2016 4:16 PM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: [SERIALST] Filling in back issues of print journals?

Hello all,

I'm a relatively new serials technician and have been debating the relative merits of filling in incomplete volumes of print journals at my institution. Sometimes there's a gap in the middle of a run that seems obvious to fill when presented with the opportunity, particularly for a title with no online access or to which we might conceivably no longer have online access at some future time. Other times our holdings for a certain title end in the middle of a volume, and I'm left with the decision about whether to attempt to complete that volume.

What is your institution's approach to this situation? Would you try to complete a volume at the end of your print holdings for a title? Would it matter if you had online access, particularly if you felt your institution would always maintain that access due to the importance/status of the title?

I appreciate your thoughts!

Best,

Monica

Monica Howell, MLS, EdS
Serials Technician, Archivist
Greenawalt Library
Northwestern Health Sciences University

2501 W. 84th St., Bloomington, MN 55431
mhowell@nwhealth.edu
P: 952-888-4777 x218

To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1