WT Cox had the lowest quote for us when we were re-evaluating last year.  We don’t have a lot of large packages.  We have about 400 subscriptions and it would be very time consuming to manage them personally, especially with one person doing the serials job. 

 

 

Abbigail Stauber

Library Technician

 

P: 724.847.6693  - F:  724.847.6687

 

acgregg@geneva.edu

GENEVA COLLEGE  3200 College Ave., Beaver Falls, PA 15010

 

 

 

From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Remy, Charlie
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 1:51 PM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: [SERIALST] Serial Jobbers

 

Hi All,

 

My library currently uses EBSCO as our serials jobber. Our contract with them has ended and so have our discounts on inflationary increases for EBSCO database products. 

 

We’re trying to decide if it’s worth sending out a bid for a new serials jobber given the few that seem to still be in existence. 

 

For libraries that have recently gone through this process, which jobber ended up having the lowest service charge? Besides, EBSCO, WT Cox, and Harrasowitz, are there any other jobbers left?

 

Given how so many of our journal subscriptions are now part of large publisher packages, have any libraries decided to drop their jobber and manage subscriptions on their own?

 

I look forward to your thoughts on this. 

 

Charlie

 

 

Charlie Remy
Assistant Professor 
Electronic Resources and Serials Librarian
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Library
UTC-Dept 6456
600 Douglas St.
Chattanooga, TN 37403
charlie-remy@utc.edu
Tel. 423-425-4470

 

 

To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1


To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1