This conversation has hit home for me as well and I can say that our budget has held its own. But that’s a fluke, really, and we are well aware that this may not / probably will not last. (My publisher/vendor friends, don’t get any ideas based on what I just wrote ;-)) In spite of our ok budget situation, back in 2010 we ditched our whole big deals approach with three major publishers, kept a small number of subscriptions with those particular publishers, and moved fully into the PPV model instead. This has been a very good move for us. I have stated elsewhere that I do not view this as a panacea for everyone and that is not how this should be viewed. Please don’t read it that way. It makes sense for our particular situation.

So I therefore agree with Jennifer that more publishers need to get on board here. I spoke with some of them at the just concluded NASIG 2014 conference (one of the best conferences I’ve ever been to, btw) and conveyed this message to them. Essentially, the message I give is, something is better than nothing. Work with us. We will not, and cannot, support a niche subscription of $8-9,000 per year with you — historical usage doesn't justify it — but we are happy to work on a PPV arrangement where you get something. I think in fairness, there is more receptivity to this than in the past 2-3 years on the part of publishers.

For us the bottom line is that our users get access to a huge amount more journal article content; they use it more and more, and we can be assured that it is money well spent. This is the ultimate demand-driven acquisitions model, more effective and useful to users, I think, than all the talk wrt e-books. It has been very interesting to track the usage trends since 2010. Usage is going way up and we have had no problem using all our tokens. We buy as much as we can at a time, driving the per article cost lower. We also evaluate which titles have reached a point where a subscription makes more sense, not just financially but programmatically, and we work to convert them to subscriptions. But this isn’t very often the case. We also carefully look at and invest in one-time backfile purchases or add to our portfolio of e-resources with new subscriptions or acquisitions. Our faculty, especially in the sciences, are also really on board with this.

One more thing: we deliberately have chosen unmediated access as we don’t think our users need to know how we are acquiring something.

Steve


On May 6, 2014, at 11:25 AM, van Sickle, Jennifer <Jennifer.vanSickle@TRINCOLL.EDU> wrote:

Adding to what Diane said, we are a small liberal arts college, and our budget hasn't allowed us to keep up with 5% or more inflation either.  We rely heavily on various pay per view/on demand services, and I would encourage more publishers to get on board with this model.  

--Jennifer van Sickle
Trinity College
Hartford, CT
________________________________________
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] on behalf of Diane Westerfield [Diane.Westerfield@COLORADOCOLLEGE.EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 11:43 AM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] Restructuring Online Tiers/Pricing Changes

A little plain speaking:

We small institutions have trouble with over 5% increases as well. You may wish to step institutions up gradually into the tiers you want.

I concur that since our budget usually doesn't increase even 5% each year, annual increases force us to cancel lesser-used databases (we canceled ~$20,000 worth this year). Eventually we will have to look at individual journal subscriptions; in the not so distant future we may have to go to Pay Per View models for some of our journal packages. The journal publishing industry is eating its own tail by hiking prices drastically every year.

Academic institutions are generally unwilling to cut athletic teams or stop building climbing walls in order to give more money to the library. Higher education has become very competitive. Schools are usually more interested in investing big money on visible enticements for prospective students and alumni, rather than beefing up the library's ethereal electronic holdings.

To the vendors who hold increases to 5% or below: thank you!

--

Diane Westerfield, Electronic Resources & Serials Librarian
Tutt Library, Colorado College
diane.westerfield@coloradocollege.edu
(719) 389-6661
(719) 389-6082 (fax)



-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Seago, Catherine
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 8:45 AM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] Restructuring Online Tiers/Pricing Changes

As a person from a larger institution, I can concur price increases of more than 5% need to be advertised well in advance and have a clear justification of the expense. Larger institutions may have larger budgets and more usage than smaller institutions, but our budgets are up against the same constraints as everybody else's, so big increases usually cannot be absorbed, but instead force us to chose between resources.  - Sincerely, Kate Seago, University of Kentucky.

-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Linda Wobbe
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:32 AM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] Restructuring Online Tiers/Pricing Changes

Hi Daniel,
Thanks for asking! Here are a few of my thoughts.

Increases of more than 5-7% are beyond what can be absorbed. I can't speak for large institutions, but a 20% increase should be publicized a year in advance so budget preparations can be made.

And please use FTE not usage or Carnegie classification on which to base your tiers. There are many institutions with small Chemistry departments requiring your resource.

Linda Wobbe
Saint Mary's College of CA

Sent from my iPad

On May 5, 2014, at 7:57 PM, Daniel Reiss <DReiss@AOAC.ORG> wrote:

Hello all,

I’m writing on behalf of AOAC INTERNATIONAL, a not-for-profit association and global voluntary consensus standards developing organization.  Among other professional services, AOAC publishes a renowned peer-reviewed scientific journal; the Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL as well as the Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL.  Each are offered in both print and online editions.

I’m posting in this forum in an attempt to gauge the potential reaction to an upcoming change in our tiers and pricing for access to our online content.

To date we offer annual subscription to online content via essentially 3 tiers of license: individual use-only, small or single-site shared access, and everything else.  "Everything else" essentially means anything goes; universal access is permitted among all authorized users.  Multinational organizations, public libraries, academic institutions and multi-site institutions all fall under this category under our existing pricing structure.  We are hoping to more clearly define and more fairly price/value our product for our "everything else" subscribers.  This change is to be implemented by 2015.  Subscribers to be notified around June 1.

Through this forum I'm hoping to obtain some insight as to others' experiences with (or reaction to) implementation of the following:

Publisher's creation of additional tiers/price points and re-categorizing existing subscribers.
Price increase of 20% or more for the top tier, affecting the biggest
users Issues with reseller agencies?
Other questions or factors worth considering?

Thanks for reading and for sharing your thoughts.

Kind regards,

Daniel

Daniel Reiss
Customer Service Coordinator
AOAC INTERNATIONAL
Tel:  1 (800) 379-2622 ext 112 (Toll Free North America)
Tel:  1 (301) 924-7077 ext 112 (Worldwide)
Fax: 1 (301) 924-7087
Email: CustomerService@aoac.org<mailto:CustomerService@aoac.org>
Web:  www.aoac.org<http://www.aoac.org/>



***********************************************
* You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries
discussion forum)
* To unsubscribe, send an email to the server address: LISTSERV@LIST.UVM.EDU .
  Do NOT include a subject line. Type as an email message these two
words: SIGNOFF SERIALST
* For additional information, see  the SERIALST Scope, Purpose and
Usage Guidelines <http://www.uvm.edu/~bmaclenn/serialst.html>
***********************************************




***********************************************
* You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries discussion forum)
* To unsubscribe, send an email to the server address: LISTSERV@LIST.UVM.EDU .
   Do NOT include a subject line. Type as an email message these two words: SIGNOFF SERIALST
* Have questions or need help? Contact: SERIALST-REQUEST@LIST.UVM.EDU
* For additional information, see  the SERIALST Scope, Purpose and Usage Guidelines <http://www.uvm.edu/~bmaclenn/serialst.html>
***********************************************




***********************************************
* You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries discussion forum)
* To unsubscribe, send an email to the server address: LISTSERV@LIST.UVM.EDU .
   Do NOT include a subject line. Type as an email message these two words: SIGNOFF SERIALST
* Have questions or need help? Contact: SERIALST-REQUEST@LIST.UVM.EDU
* For additional information, see  the SERIALST Scope, Purpose and Usage Guidelines <http://www.uvm.edu/~bmaclenn/serialst.html>
***********************************************




***********************************************
* You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries discussion forum)
* To unsubscribe, send an email to the server address: LISTSERV@LIST.UVM.EDU .
   Do NOT include a subject line. Type as an email message these two words: SIGNOFF SERIALST
* Have questions or need help? Contact: SERIALST-REQUEST@LIST.UVM.EDU
* For additional information, see  the SERIALST Scope, Purpose and Usage Guidelines <http://www.uvm.edu/~bmaclenn/serialst.html>
***********************************************




***********************************************
* You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries discussion forum)
* To unsubscribe, send an email to the server address: LISTSERV@LIST.UVM.EDU .
   Do NOT include a subject line. Type as an email message these two words: SIGNOFF SERIALST
* Have questions or need help? Contact: SERIALST-REQUEST@LIST.UVM.EDU
* For additional information, see  the SERIALST Scope, Purpose and Usage Guidelines <http://www.uvm.edu/~bmaclenn/serialst.html>
***********************************************


Steve Oberg
Assistant Professor of Library Science
Electronic Resources and Serials
Wheaton College (IL)
+1 (630) 752-5852

***********************************************
* You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries discussion forum)
* To unsubscribe, send an email to the server address: LISTSERV@LIST.UVM.EDU . Do NOT include a subject line. Type as an email message these two words: SIGNOFF SERIALST
* Have questions or need help? Contact: SERIALST-REQUEST@LIST.UVM.EDU
* For additional information, see SERIALST Scope, Purpose and Usage Guidelines.
***********************************************