We went through this last week. Putting the corporate body’s initials in front of the title is not considered a major title change. Check
the rules….
Mike Saunders,
Serials Officer,
National Gallery of
K1N 9N4
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion
Forum [mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of
Barbara Pope
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 12:50 PM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] MIT Technology Review
Hello, everyone. We are in the midst of cleaning up our ILS for a hopefully impending migration and also move of our current periodicals
collection, so I have been preoccupied with those things. While all that has been happening, I apparently missed what looks like a title change last year of Technology Review to MIT Technology Review. Oops.
Technology Review : MIT's magazine of innovation 1998- (this record is still open)
MIT Technology Review 2012-
In contrast to some other title changes where it is not so obvious whether a new record is needed or not, this change is obvious.
My question is why is the old record still open?
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Barbara M. Pope, MALS
Periodicals/Reference Librarian
Axe Library
620-235-4884
bpope@pittstate.edu
***********************************************
* You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries discussion forum)
* For additional information, see
SERIALST Scope, Purpose and Usage Guidelines.
***********************************************