I hope you spelled it right in your record and not the way you spelled it in the subject of your emailJ
Mike Saunders,
Serials Officer,
National Gallery of
K1N 9N4
From:
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 9:31 AM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [SERIALST] Technollogy review (Cambridge, Mass. : 1998) or MIT technology review?
OCLC 39058693, Technology review (Cambridge, Mass. : 1998) has
246 1 |i Issues for [Nov./Dec.] 2012- have title: |a MIT technology review
Why is this not considered a title change, with a new OCLC record created for MIT technology review? Does some rule apply to keep this all under one title?
The issue Vol. 115, no. 6 has this in the From the Editor: We look different. What’s changed? … We added “MIT” to “Technology review.” Their website, technologyreview.com, shows
MIT technology review.
Jack Hall
Music Cataloger
Metadata and Bibliographic Services
A Carnegie-designated Tier One public research university
phone: 713 743 9687
fax: 713 743 9748
email: jhall@uh.edu
***********************************************
* You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries discussion forum)
* Have questions or need help? Contact:
SERIALST-REQUEST@LIST.UVM.EDU
* For additional information, see
SERIALST Scope, Purpose and Usage Guidelines.
***********************************************