Moderator's note:
The below message should not have gone out to the list, and I
apologize for letting it out. The sender is not expecting any
responses.
| Subject: |
Re: Article Linker Question re: OPAC
[Question:100729-000146] copy 2 |
| From: |
Maria Michelle Sitko <[log
in to unmask]> |
| Reply-To: |
SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion
Forum |
| Date: |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:07:10 -0400 |
| Content-Type: |
multipart/alternative |
| Parts/Attachments:
|
|
Content-Type: text/html Yes, that certainly makes sense. How else
would it know where to go ... and precisely which journal it needs
to link to.
When I have a chance, I will ask you to show me visually tho I won't
be dealing with it myself. Of course, when more enhancements come,
things and appearances will change.
Thank you!
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Courtney Tibbetts <[log
in to unmask]">[log
in to unmask]> wrote:
The URL supplied by SS is the following:
http://sirsi.marywood.edu/uhtbin/cgisirsi/x/x/0/5/?searchdata1=0000-0019
The last 8 digits are the ISSN of the journal
you are trying to link and that is the only part of the URL string
that needs to be modified. If adding a journal you should put
this string in the default URL box.
Courtney
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Maria Michelle Sitko <[log
in to unmask]" target="_blank">sitk[log
in to unmask]> wrote:
FYI... Good news.
I spoke to Courtney this morning. She will read over the links to
documentation that Serials Solutions sent to me when she gets back
next week. I asked her to follow through and to contact Stephen
Gilewski at Serials Solutions to learn how to find the urls
necessary to successfully add a persistent link at the title
specific level. I asked her to then share her findings.
Looks like we are back in business and that is is all doable. I'm
really glad that I got to the bottom of this linking problem. It
should help lessen frustration felt by our end users (and us!)!
Thanks,
--Michelle
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Maria Michelle Sitko <[log
in to unmask]" target="_blank">[log
in to unmask]> wrote:
Hello all,
I haven't heard back from anyone yet about this and was wondering
if we could perhaps go over this in the morning?
Thanks,
--Michelle