"Crabby Old Lady Cuts Loose," Ronni Bennett, As Time Goes By, December 30, 2019
By and for older people.  Read the comments.  Encourage discussion on aging issues among members of your boards and committees.
"Crabby Old Lady has had enough. She has lost all patience with age denial.

If you've had a face lift or Botox, get out of Crabby's way. She doesn't want to know you. If you shave five or ten years off your age, who do you think you're kidding? You have made yourself ridiculous.

If you say things like “age is just a number” or “you're only as old as you feel” or “gee, you don't look that old”, stop insulting Crabby's intelligence. Anyone who uses those phrases is, by definition, old. Get over it and enjoy your great good fortune at still being upright. Many people don't get the chance."
Go here -> https://www.timegoesby.net/weblog/2019/12/crabby-old-lady-cuts-loose.html


"What The Young Adults of 1920 Thought of the World They Were Inheriting," Timothy Taylor, Conversable Economist, January 2, 2020
"A century ago, John F. Carter wrote an essay about “These Wild Young People’ by One of Them,” in the Atlantic Monthly (September 1920,  pp. 301-304, an excerpt is here, although as far as I know the entire essay isn't freely available online). It offers a useful reminder that complaints from young adults about the terrible world they are inheriting, so much worse than any previous generation ever inherited, are nothing new. Enjoy the 100 year-old version of the classic young-to-old intergenerational rant:"
Go here -> http://conversableeconomist.blogspot.com/2020/01/what-young-adults-of-1920-thought-of.html


"Ten Year Check-Up: The Affordable Care Act has Enhanced Access to Quality Health Care for Low-Income Older Adults," Natalie Kean, Senior Staff Attorney, Sahar Takshi, Colin Alexander Health Fellow, Justice in Aging, July 2019
As the attacks on the ACA continue, it's important to understand the effects of the ACA on older folks.
The ACA has improved overall health care coverage for many older Americans with limited income and resources. Shortly after the ACA’s Medicaid expansion and reforms to the individual and group health insurance markets were implemented, the uninsured rate for older adults ages 50-64 was cut in half.

One of the ACA’s most well-known provisions, Medicaid expansion, extended coverage to more older adults ages 50-64 who are too young to qualify for Medicare and had no health coverage options pre-ACA.  Before the ACA, older adults could only qualify for Medicaid if they had dependent children, were age 65 or older, or had a disability meeting strict Social Security criteria, in addition to having income and assets below strict limits.

ACA effectively eliminated those categories and the asset test for adults under age 65 in states that chose to expand Medicaid coverage to adults without dependent children up to 138% of the federal poverty level (FPL) using new authority and federal funding."
Go here ->  https://www.justiceinaging.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/10-Year-Check-Up-The-ACA-Has-Enhanced-Access-to-Quality-Health-Care-for....pdf?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=d69dff8c-c8ec-493f-a1da-c8cbf8f7b88c


"How to Ensure Fair Voting Maps for the Next Decade and Beyond, Independent redistricting commissions are a key way to fight gerrymandered voting districts. Our new guide for policymakers and advocates provides a road map for creating a strong commission," Yuri Rudensky, Annie Lo, Brennan Center for Justice, December 12, 2019
"In 2021, all 50 states will redraw legislative and congressional maps for the next decade, making 2020 the last chance to put fair redistricting processes in place around the country before maps are redrawn. The last round of redistricting saw unprecedented gerrymanders, often targeting communities of color. The good news is that Americans across the political spectrum support independent redistricting systems that promote equitable representation. A well-designed commission can do just that.

Independent redistricting commissions that put citizens at the helm of map-drawing and have strong guidelines in place can help guard against partisan and racial gerrymandering. And commission-based redistricting has a clear track record of fairer outcomes with less litigation."
Go here -> https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/how-ensure-fair-voting-maps-next-decade-and-beyond
And here -> https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/gerrymandering-fair-representation


"New election data highlights the ongoing impact of 2011 GOP redistricting in Wisconsin," Craig Gilbert, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, December 6, 2018
On Wisconsin.  This is what happened in Wisconsin with extreme gerrymandering.
"As critics of the map have pointed out, Democrats won 53% of all the Assembly votes cast statewide while coming away with only 36% of the seats."
Go here -> https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/blogs/wisconsin-voter/2018/12/06/wisconsin-gerrymandering-data-shows-stark-impact-redistricting/2219092002/


"Wisconsin once had a 'model' voting rights program for people with disabilities. Officials have let it decline," Rory Linnane, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, December 23, 2019
On Wisconsin.
"Despite the clamor to turn out Wisconsin voters in 2020, some voters might be stopped at the doors of their polling places.

Auditors have flagged hundreds of violations at Wisconsin polls that make it harder or impossible for voters with disabilities to vote in person. A Journal Sentinel review of audits found officials are missing required action plans to fix most of these issues from the last two years.

Though Wisconsin once had a robust program for monitoring accessibility problems at polls — one that was lauded as a best practice by a presidential commission in 2014 — state officials have let it wane. Since the recognition, officials have missed audits, been slow to follow up on accessibility violations and provided fewer supplies to help polling places become more accessible."
Go here -> https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/solutions/2019/12/23/wisconsins-model-disability-rights-voting-program-has-declined/2694478001/


"How Cutting Food Stamps Can Add Costs Elsewhere," Austin Frakt, The Incidental Economist, January 2, 2020
Did you ever notice that when fat cat politicians and pundits talk about policies that screw poor people they say "it's for their own good."
 "The Department of Agriculture recently finished work on a new rule that may take food stamps away from nearly 700,000 Americans by tightening work requirements. Several times in the past year, the government has proposed cutting food stamp eligibility. The new rule it s intended to save almost $8 billion over five years.

It’s not clear how much money would actually be saved, research suggests, given the costs that might come from a decline in the health and well-being of many of the country’s 14.3 million “food-insecure” households.

The Department of Agriculture defines food insecurity as a lack of consistent access to enough food for an active, healthy life. It affects low-income, single-parent, and black and Hispanic households the most, but it cuts across many demographic lines and affects 11 percent of American households over all."
Go here -> https://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/how-cutting-food-stamps-can-add-costs-elsewhere/


"Food Cuts Could Hike Medical Costs-Studies show recipients of SNAP benefits are less likely to be hospitalized, reducing medical costs," By Gregory Humphrey, Urban Milwaukee, January 4, 2020
 "Might the Republican zeal to constrict government programs and limit the number of people from receiving some services actually cost the country more in the long run? Some studies have suggested that very well may the case, as with food stamps. With nearly 700,000 people potentially being cut from the federal program comes a consequence that deserves national attention. "
Go here -> https://urbanmilwaukee.com/2020/01/04/op-ed-food-cuts-could-hike-medical-costs/
And here -> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28973507


"Fox-con will keep costing locals a whole lot more in 2020, and Foxconn ain't paying them back," Jake's Wisconsin Funhouse, January 1, 2020
On Wisconsin.
Why care? Well, we could have done a lot of other things with $3 billion besides giving it to a Taiwanese company. Hold your legislators accountable.
"So in addition to the costliness, the Fox-con has likely done a lot to give Foxconn benefits and incentives that Wisconsin-based companies haven't been able to set, and has paved the way for other giveaways in Wisconsin to the politically-connected at the expense of everyone else (can you imagine how many more times this would have been abused under a third term of Walker?)"
Go here -> http://jakehasablog.blogspot.com/2020/01/foxconn-project-continues-to-cost-whole.html
And here -> https://thepoliticalenvironment.blogspot.com/2019/12/subsidies-for-foxconn-weaken-trumps.html


"How Pets Contribute to Healthy Aging," National Poll on Healthy Aging, University of Michigan, April 2019
Because I like dogs!
How Pets Contribute to Healthy Aging
"Many older Americans live with pets and consider them part of the family. Pets can offer companionship and have a positive impact on
a person’s health and well-being. In October 2018, the University of Michigan National Poll on Healthy Aging asked a national sample of adults
age 50–80 about their pets, reasons for having — or not having — pets, and the benefits and challenges of owning a pet."
Go here -> https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/148428/NPHA_Pets-Report_FINAL-040319.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y


"A child care center on a campus for seniors? It's working in Lancaster," Scott Scanlon, The Buffalo News, January 4, 2020
Is anyone aware of this type of thing in Wisconsin?
"GreenFields has about 500 full- and part-time employees, including doctors, therapists, nurses, certified nursing assistants, nurses’ aides, housekeepers, and laundry and maintenance staff. Roughly three-quarters of those workers are women.

“Almost all of our staff is at an age where either they're caring for kids or they're caring for parents,” Koenig said. “You can't just throw dollars at them. It doesn't work, especially with unemployment as low as it is. They have a bad day, they can just go somewhere else, so the thought process was, ‘How do we get people to come to campus to stay, to be invested? How do we make the staff feel part of the family?’ If we can keep them here for a couple of months, we'll have a better chance.”
Go here -> https://buffalonews.com/2020/01/04/a-childcare-center-on-a-campus-for-seniors-its-working-in-lancaster/