Newly discovered SWAN comet in the morning sky
Nick James
(03 Apr 2025 05:02 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] Newly discovered SWAN comet in the morning sky
Nick James
(04 Apr 2025 04:38 UTC)
|
SWAN25F this morning.
Peter Carson
(05 Apr 2025 08:48 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] SWAN25F this morning.
Nick James
(05 Apr 2025 19:40 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] SWAN25F this morning.
Nick James
(06 Apr 2025 11:44 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] SWAN25F this morning.
Peter Tickner
(06 Apr 2025 11:48 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] SWAN25F this morning.
Nick James
(06 Apr 2025 11:57 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] SWAN25F this morning.
Peter Tickner
(06 Apr 2025 12:03 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] SWAN25F this morning.
Peter Tickner
(06 Apr 2025 21:48 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] SWAN25F this morning. Nick James (07 Apr 2025 03:37 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] SWAN25F this morning.
Nick James
(07 Apr 2025 06:39 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] SWAN25F this morning.
Fabrizio Montanucci
(07 Apr 2025 07:24 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] SWAN25F this morning.
Peter Tickner
(07 Apr 2025 09:12 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] SWAN25F this morning.
Nick James
(11 Apr 2025 05:06 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] SWAN25F this morning.
MIke OLASON
(11 Apr 2025 07:54 UTC)
|
Re: [BAA Comets] C/2025 F2 (SWAN) on April 18
Nick James
(18 Apr 2025 04:28 UTC)
|
RE: [BAA Comets] C/2025 F2 (SWAN) on April 18
james@dawson.me.uk
(18 Apr 2025 07:03 UTC)
|
Peter, These are the positions for this morning: Date (UTC) HH RA Dec delta r elong mag '/hr PA " sig PA ---- -- -- -- ------------- ----------- ------ ------ ----- --- ------ ------ ---- --- 2025 04 07 03 23 32 42.391 +25 29 48.20 1.4269 .72866 28.6 12.8 3.29 56.7 .046 53 2025 04 07 04 23 32 54.607 +25 31 36.67 1.4258 .72778 28.6 12.8 3.30 56.7 .047 53 2025 04 07 05 23 33 06.832 +25 33 25.23 1.4246 .72691 28.6 12.8 3.30 56.7 .048 53 Nick. On 06/04/2025 22:48, Peter Tickner - peter.tickner1472 at btinternet.com (via baa-comet list) wrote: > Now I am confused! I asked for the ephemerides for tomorrow but it started at 05:00 UT. So I asked a second time from now. It has given me from 05:00 UT again but all the values for RA and DEC are different. > > Which set is right? >